Author Topic: Celtics News  (Read 3841598 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3405 on: Yesterday at 11:59:59 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15830
  • Tommy Points: 1842
Still can't believe he gave up Brown for 36 y/o Paul George and picks.

And didn't take Giannis + Portis for Brown, Hugo/Baylor, and picks.

Brad will be held against this.

Yep. We should be looking at a Pritchard, White, Tatum, Portis, Giannis starting lineup. Bench consisting of Connely, Hauser, Harper Jr, Walsh, Queta would have been serviceable enough. Maybe they are able to entice a Beal or KCP to join for the vet min. Brad should lose his executive of the year award for making such a blunder. Celtics would have been a top 3 team in the NBA, but instead they are likely a first or second round playoff exit. Once again..
« Last Edit: Today at 12:12:57 AM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3406 on: Today at 05:42:16 AM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27202
  • Tommy Points: 2828
Still can't believe he gave up Brown for 36 y/o Paul George and picks.

And didn't take Giannis + Portis for Brown, Hugo/Baylor, and picks.

Brad will be held against this.

Yep. We should be looking at a Pritchard, White, Tatum, Portis, Giannis starting lineup. Bench consisting of Connely, Hauser, Harper Jr, Walsh, Queta would have been serviceable enough. Maybe they are able to entice a Beal or KCP to join for the vet min. Brad should lose his executive of the year award for making such a blunder. Celtics would have been a top 3 team in the NBA, but instead they are likely a first or second round playoff exit. Once again..

The only problem with your logic is that neither of you know what was actually on the table with Milwaukee. The idea that it was done if Brad gives up Baylor/Hugo is assumed, not confirmed. And unknown whether JB indicated he wouldn?t sign longterm with the Bucks. If it was there for the taking I agree with you it seems the sensible thing to do.

Of course there?d be folks here saying the future of our franchise is in the hands of a man with an injury waiting to happen.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3407 on: Today at 06:59:03 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20668
  • Tommy Points: 1363
Quote
Brad will be held against this.

Until Bill Chisholm came along, Brad made moves to make the team better on the court.   Since, Bill Chisholm came along Brad has made moves to improve our bottom line.    I blame Wyc for selling the team to Bill Chisholm, and Bill Chisholm for being a cheapskate.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3408 on: Today at 08:55:08 AM »

Offline gift

  • NCE
  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4124
  • Tommy Points: 300
Quote
Brad will be held against this.

Until Bill Chisholm came along, Brad made moves to make the team better on the court.   Since, Bill Chisholm came along Brad has made moves to improve our bottom line.    I blame Wyc for selling the team to Bill Chisholm, and Bill Chisholm for being a cheapskate.

I don't blame Wyc. It wasn't his decision to sell and so I don't think the buyer was his decision either.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3409 on: Today at 09:24:52 AM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34140
  • Tommy Points: 10358
Quote
Brad will be held against this.

Until Bill Chisholm came along, Brad made moves to make the team better on the court.   Since, Bill Chisholm came along Brad has made moves to improve our bottom line.    I blame Wyc for selling the team to Bill Chisholm, and Bill Chisholm for being a cheapskate.

I don't blame Wyc. It wasn't his decision to sell and so I don't think the buyer was his decision either.
how was it not Wyc's decision to sell and how was it not his decision who to sell to?  He was in full control of both situations.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3410 on: Today at 09:54:21 AM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27202
  • Tommy Points: 2828
Quote
Brad will be held against this.

Until Bill Chisholm came along, Brad made moves to make the team better on the court.   Since, Bill Chisholm came along Brad has made moves to improve our bottom line.    I blame Wyc for selling the team to Bill Chisholm, and Bill Chisholm for being a cheapskate.

I don't blame Wyc. It wasn't his decision to sell and so I don't think the buyer was his decision either.
how was it not Wyc's decision to sell and how was it not his decision who to sell to?  He was in full control of both situations.

Not sure, but I think the decision to sell may have been Wyc's father.  And who to sell to?  Well, I think you take the best offer.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3411 on: Today at 10:00:11 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20668
  • Tommy Points: 1363
Quote
I don't blame Wyc. It wasn't his decision to sell and so I don't think the buyer was his decision either.

There were others buyers, Stephen Pagliuca and  Friedkin Group, my understanding is he did not have a chance to up his bid.  Maybe he would not be so cheap.   I will lay off this topic when I see them spend for the betterment of the team.   It won't be this year.  I seen the money ball movie and it failed miserably when the Browns hired the architect of it.

Of course, they'll hide behind the new Collective bargaining unit.   This will be there mantra, what other teams has it affected?  The Thunder maybe, but expect every team to blame it for every unpopular decision hence, forth.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3412 on: Today at 11:47:03 AM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15830
  • Tommy Points: 1842
Still can't believe he gave up Brown for 36 y/o Paul George and picks.

And didn't take Giannis + Portis for Brown, Hugo/Baylor, and picks.

Brad will be held against this.

Yep. We should be looking at a Pritchard, White, Tatum, Portis, Giannis starting lineup. Bench consisting of Connely, Hauser, Harper Jr, Walsh, Queta would have been serviceable enough. Maybe they are able to entice a Beal or KCP to join for the vet min. Brad should lose his executive of the year award for making such a blunder. Celtics would have been a top 3 team in the NBA, but instead they are likely a first or second round playoff exit. Once again..

The only problem with your logic is that neither of you know what was actually on the table with Milwaukee. The idea that it was done if Brad gives up Baylor/Hugo is assumed, not confirmed. And unknown whether JB indicated he wouldn?t sign longterm with the Bucks. If it was there for the taking I agree with you it seems the sensible thing to do.

Of course there?d be folks here saying the future of our franchise is in the hands of a man with an injury waiting to happen.

I mean, the top insider in the NBA (who I believe to be credible) is saying this. So I don?t see how it is a problem with logic or an assumption.


Thursday, Shams Charania of ESPN came out and shot that one down more definitely than anything we?ve heard to date. On the Pat McAfee Show, Shams was asked about the extension rumor and basically scoffed, shaking his head and making it clear that there was no validity to that report.

Shams: The breakdown with the Giannis, Boston conversations was very simple. The Celtics did not want to give up Hugo Gonzalez and/or Baylor Scheierman and another draft asset when the Bucks asked for that.

« Last Edit: Today at 12:09:19 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #3413 on: Today at 11:51:38 AM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 65129
  • Tommy Points: -25337
  • Optionality: Cope Springs Eternal
Still can't believe he gave up Brown for 36 y/o Paul George and picks.

And didn't take Giannis + Portis for Brown, Hugo/Baylor, and picks.

Brad will be held against this.

Yep. We should be looking at a Pritchard, White, Tatum, Portis, Giannis starting lineup. Bench consisting of Connely, Hauser, Harper Jr, Walsh, Queta would have been serviceable enough. Maybe they are able to entice a Beal or KCP to join for the vet min. Brad should lose his executive of the year award for making such a blunder. Celtics would have been a top 3 team in the NBA, but instead they are likely a first or second round playoff exit. Once again..

The only problem with your logic is that neither of you know what was actually on the table with Milwaukee. The idea that it was done if Brad gives up Baylor/Hugo is assumed, not confirmed. And unknown whether JB indicated he wouldn?t sign longterm with the Bucks. If it was there for the taking I agree with you it seems the sensible thing to do.

Of course there?d be folks here saying the future of our franchise is in the hands of a man with an injury waiting to happen.

I mean, the top insider in the NBA (who I believe to be credible) is saying this. So I don?t see how it is a problem with logic or an assumption.


Thursday, Shams Charania of ESPN came out and shot that one down more definitely than anything we?ve heard to date. On the Pat McAfee Show, Shams was asked about the extension rumor and basically scoffed, shaking his head and making it clear that there was no validity to that report.

The breakdown with the Giannis, Boston conversations was very simple. The Celtics did not want to give up Hugo Gonzalez and/or Baylor Scheierman and another draft asset when the Bucks asked for that.


I think NG is right:  nowhere has it been reported that if Boston added Hugo, Scheierman, or a #1 pick that the deal would have been done.

Even Shams doesn't have specifics on whether it was Hugo and Scheierman, or Hugo or Scheierman, nor does he list the draft asset.  And again, we don't know that that offer was an automatic yes from Milwaukee.

It sounds like Milwaukee was debating which direction they wanted to go until the end, but their slight preference was always for Miami's package for whatever reason.
I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!