Author Topic: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22  (Read 48903 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #165 on: January 06, 2022, 09:03:43 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
The TNT guys (mike breen?) were talking about Schroder betting on himself. Breen then says something like “so far it hasn’t worked to his favor but who knows, it’s still a long season”. I have no idea what he means by that!

I think it means he's not seen Schröder play much :')

Or maybe the thinking here is that Schröder should've been playing in the starting lineup? For this gamble to work?

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #166 on: January 06, 2022, 09:05:31 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45921
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Grant is off tonight.

He needs to be in that corner.

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #167 on: January 06, 2022, 09:05:33 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15245
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Dislike Van Gundy, both of them

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #168 on: January 06, 2022, 09:05:48 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51956
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Honestly, I'm ready for a Schroeder-less team. Hate his game. Does not seem like a team player, and seems to stagnate the offense, let alone his lackluster D.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #169 on: January 06, 2022, 09:06:18 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
Fournier?

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #170 on: January 06, 2022, 09:06:55 PM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2681
  • Tommy Points: 579
The TNT guys (mike breen?) were talking about Schroder betting on himself. Breen then says something like “so far it hasn’t worked to his favor but who knows, it’s still a long season”. I have no idea what he means by that!

I think it means he's not seen Schröder play much :')

I think he means in terms of their record and wins

Or maybe the thinking here is that Schröder should've been playing in the starting lineup? For this gamble to work?

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #171 on: January 06, 2022, 09:07:02 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Grant is off tonight.

He needs to be in that corner.

He’s been off for a month

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #172 on: January 06, 2022, 09:07:04 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45921
  • Tommy Points: 3340
No one else on our bench can play?

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #173 on: January 06, 2022, 09:07:33 PM »

Offline radiohead

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7703
  • Tommy Points: 1381
The TNT guys (mike breen?) were talking about Schroder betting on himself. Breen then says something like “so far it hasn’t worked to his favor but who knows, it’s still a long season”. I have no idea what he means by that!

I think it means he's not seen Schröder play much :')

Or maybe the thinking here is that Schröder should've been playing in the starting lineup? For this gamble to work?

But he’s actually playing well right? Specially when JB was out. But yeah you’re right, maybe he was expecting to be a starter.

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #174 on: January 06, 2022, 09:07:54 PM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2681
  • Tommy Points: 579
And so it begins

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #175 on: January 06, 2022, 09:08:13 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
The TNT guys (mike breen?) were talking about Schroder betting on himself. Breen then says something like “so far it hasn’t worked to his favor but who knows, it’s still a long season”. I have no idea what he means by that!

I think it means he's not seen Schröder play much :')

Or maybe the thinking here is that Schröder should've been playing in the starting lineup? For this gamble to work?

Schröder gonna get paid.

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #176 on: January 06, 2022, 09:08:34 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
The TNT guys (mike breen?) were talking about Schroder betting on himself. Breen then says something like “so far it hasn’t worked to his favor but who knows, it’s still a long season”. I have no idea what he means by that!

I think it means he's not seen Schröder play much :')

Or maybe the thinking here is that Schröder should've been playing in the starting lineup? For this gamble to work?

But he’s actually playing well right? Specially when JB was out. But yeah you’re right, maybe he was expecting to be a starter.

Yeah hence the earlier - I don't think he's watched Schröder much cuz he's had some insane games.

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #177 on: January 06, 2022, 09:08:46 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45921
  • Tommy Points: 3340
You need energy on the second night of back to backs.

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #178 on: January 06, 2022, 09:08:49 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25646
  • Tommy Points: 2725
Yeah -- it's a game. No lead is comfortable.

Nice Rob!

Re: Celtics (18-20) at Knicks (17-20) Game #39 1/6/22
« Reply #179 on: January 06, 2022, 09:09:05 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
Dislike Van Gundy, both of them

Stan's great on Twitter these days :D

Very candid.