Author Topic: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21  (Read 23887 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #150 on: November 17, 2021, 10:00:23 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Other than Josh Richardson, 47 minutes of bench play, 0-9, 0-5 from three, ZERO points.

That’s the loss right there.
This equates to a 5 man bench group going out for a nine minute stretch and not scoring a single point.

Think about that people.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #151 on: November 17, 2021, 10:02:01 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45921
  • Tommy Points: 3340
We took more 3s than the Hawks. Coach thinks we can shoot better than we can.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #152 on: November 17, 2021, 10:03:01 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45921
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Other than Josh Richardson, 47 minutes of bench play, 0-9, 0-5 from three, ZERO points.

That’s the loss right there.
This equates to a 5 man bench group going out for a nine minute stretch and not scoring a single point.

Think about that people.

Yeah...Pritchard, Nesmith and Romeo have all fallen off a cliff.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #153 on: November 17, 2021, 10:03:29 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Other than Josh Richardson, 47 minutes of bench play, 0-9, 0-5 from three, ZERO points.

Part of why trading JB won't work.

Don't give away good parts when you need good parts. That's like swapping good for good. Your other guys will still be useless.

This is also my pickle with trading Smart. Smart's not the problem. Extended bench is. Smart's GREAT to have off the bench on a championship team.
I don't have an issue with guys 11-15 not being good. They usually aren't. And in the playoffs, they won't be playing.

But they have to show that every once in a while when the team is down 2-3 top guys that they can contribute something...anything ...but this deep bench group has given this team next to nothing, absolutely nothing, all year when called on.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #154 on: November 17, 2021, 10:03:41 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45921
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Ime says we have "Quality shooters". Were are they?

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #155 on: November 17, 2021, 10:05:46 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
On the bright side, the Lakers lost too

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #156 on: November 17, 2021, 10:06:30 PM »

Offline SparzWizard

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18875
  • Tommy Points: 1119
On the bright side, the Lakers lost too

I wonder whose losing streak will end first- the C's or the Lakers


#FireJoe
#JTJB (Just Trade Jaylen Brown) 2022 - 2025
I am the Master of Panic.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #157 on: November 17, 2021, 10:07:03 PM »

Offline Mahk E Mahk

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1416
  • Tommy Points: 281
Bridge year for sure

sincere question: bridge to what exactly? with the current roster, coach, and O/D strategy, it seems like it’s a several year bridge.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #158 on: November 17, 2021, 10:07:50 PM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
Other than Josh Richardson, 47 minutes of bench play, 0-9, 0-5 from three, ZERO points.

That’s the loss right there.
This equates to a 5 man bench group going out for a nine minute stretch and not scoring a single point.

Think about that people.

Yeah...Pritchard, Nesmith and Romeo have all fallen off a cliff.

Only Romy is any good. But that's fine.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #159 on: November 17, 2021, 10:07:55 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
Ime says we have "Quality shooters". Were are they?
Rotting in the bench, unable to get rhythm because of our putrid offensive schemes.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #160 on: November 17, 2021, 10:12:31 PM »

Offline Silas

  • 2020 CelticsStrong Draft Guru
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12844
  • Tommy Points: 2170
Bridge year for sure

The bridge to nowhere!
I've lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened.   -  Mark Twain

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #161 on: November 17, 2021, 10:19:29 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19677
  • Tommy Points: 1622
i guess that 'we're better without JB, we'll be fine while he is out' take didn't go so well....

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #162 on: November 17, 2021, 10:20:01 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7378
  • Tommy Points: 570
I don't think this is even a .500 team.

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #163 on: November 17, 2021, 10:22:38 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19677
  • Tommy Points: 1622
I don't think this is even a .500 team.

I don't think you are wrong, but not many teams will play plus .500 ball down two starters..

we were missing a good 35 points from our roster tonight, if someone, anyone doesn't step up how can you win?

Re: Celtics (7-7) at Hawks (6-9) Game #15 11/17/21
« Reply #164 on: November 17, 2021, 10:23:00 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
I don't think this is even a .500 team.

Fair enough assessment. They are struggling to stay near .500 so far as it is.