Author Topic: Celtics to name a team captain?  (Read 11516 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #45 on: October 04, 2021, 05:12:10 AM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8875
  • Tommy Points: 290
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.


Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #46 on: October 04, 2021, 07:50:15 AM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15238
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
Thanks.  That quote is attributed to me, but it was Csfan1984.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #47 on: October 04, 2021, 11:13:35 AM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.

I don’t know where you get this notion that signing for less money to play for a team projected to be rebuilding is something NBA players will typically do. I’d be interested if you can show me an example of a player who turned down a higher offer to be able to play for a worse team. Like, instead of playing for a contender and getting paid more, they chose to go to a rebuilding team and get paid less.

As an aside, do you think Tatum or Brown will stick around past their current extensions if we don’t offer them the max? Maybe we should ship their greedy butts out of here too.

- LilRip

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #48 on: October 04, 2021, 12:15:47 PM »

Offline dannyboy35

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2041
  • Tommy Points: 110
  We absolutely need designated captain of captains on the court. What happened vs Miami two years ago when the Celtics over and  over and over did not simply bring a man to the free throw line to receive a pass to beat a zone visit g is a trip to the Finals to defend our lead in titles vs the Lakers will always be mind boggling to me. I have to imagine Brad was saying this. It took hayward coming back for that one game to simply go there to relieve the ball. Nobody else would do it the previous game .
  So the players were ingnoring the coach’s instructions. We need captains.  But please not Marcus. Come on.
  It has to be the Jays. We’re hinging everything on these two. We need Ratum to try snd be more vocal if possible ( although not every leader is that way) and Jaylen to me is a natural leader. Tons of ability but wasn’t speaking of his goals being averaging so many points. We need stability on offense and Jaylen is efficient. Marcus is erratic.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #49 on: October 04, 2021, 12:17:19 PM »

Offline dannyboy35

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2041
  • Tommy Points: 110
  Just the idea that Marcus has voiced that the title of captain is meaningless is concerning. Because one of our captains then knows Marcus doesn’t really respect the title.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #50 on: October 04, 2021, 12:40:00 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13530
  • Tommy Points: 1711
  We absolutely need designated captain of captains on the court. What happened vs Miami two years ago when the Celtics over and  over and over did not simply bring a man to the free throw line to receive a pass to beat a zone visit g is a trip to the Finals to defend our lead in titles vs the Lakers will always be mind boggling to me. I have to imagine Brad was saying this. It took hayward coming back for that one game to simply go there to relieve the ball. Nobody else would do it the previous game .
  So the players were ingnoring the coach’s instructions. We need captains.  But please not Marcus. Come on.
  It has to be the Jays. We’re hinging everything on these two. We need Ratum to try snd be more vocal if possible ( although not every leader is that way) and Jaylen to me is a natural leader. Tons of ability but wasn’t speaking of his goals being averaging so many points. We need stability on offense and Jaylen is efficient. Marcus is erratic.

Or the C’s just needed a coach that wasn’t a pushover, which they now have. The coach is the leader of the team. Or at least they should be.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #51 on: October 04, 2021, 12:43:37 PM »

Offline Adelaide Celt

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1397
  • Tommy Points: 216
Not having a captain has worked out great these last few years! Leaders emerging all over the place!

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #52 on: October 04, 2021, 01:56:41 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Curious, does anyone know which other teams do/do not have team captains?

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #53 on: October 04, 2021, 02:39:00 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8875
  • Tommy Points: 290
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.

I don’t know where you get this notion that signing for less money to play for a team projected to be rebuilding is something NBA players will typically do. I’d be interested if you can show me an example of a player who turned down a higher offer to be able to play for a worse team. Like, instead of playing for a contender and getting paid more, they chose to go to a rebuilding team and get paid less.

As an aside, do you think Tatum or Brown will stick around past their current extensions if we don’t offer them the max? Maybe we should ship their greedy butts out of here too.
Again I got that you dont care about the way he left, thats on you. I have a problem with it. He did not wait he just bolted. Thats not a guy I want, I'm like KG in this regard.

Let's see what happens with Tatum and Brown before dragging them into Al's scenario.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #54 on: October 04, 2021, 02:39:22 PM »

Offline johnnygreen

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2427
  • Tommy Points: 309
Not having a captain has worked out great these last few years! Leaders emerging all over the place!

You forgot to include a sarcasm emoji.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #55 on: October 04, 2021, 03:11:53 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13530
  • Tommy Points: 1711
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.

I don’t know where you get this notion that signing for less money to play for a team projected to be rebuilding is something NBA players will typically do. I’d be interested if you can show me an example of a player who turned down a higher offer to be able to play for a worse team. Like, instead of playing for a contender and getting paid more, they chose to go to a rebuilding team and get paid less.

As an aside, do you think Tatum or Brown will stick around past their current extensions if we don’t offer them the max? Maybe we should ship their greedy butts out of here too.
Again I got that you dont care about the way he left, thats on you. I have a problem with it. He did not wait he just bolted. Thats not a guy I want, I'm like KG in this regard.

Let's see what happens with Tatum and Brown before dragging them into Al's scenario.

If someone offered you a $100M+ contract and you were on the wrong side of 30 and no longer an all star player, you think it would be wise to wait on it? It’s a business man and Al did what’s best for him and his family. Not sure how you can hold that against him.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #56 on: October 04, 2021, 04:31:25 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8875
  • Tommy Points: 290
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.

I don’t know where you get this notion that signing for less money to play for a team projected to be rebuilding is something NBA players will typically do. I’d be interested if you can show me an example of a player who turned down a higher offer to be able to play for a worse team. Like, instead of playing for a contender and getting paid more, they chose to go to a rebuilding team and get paid less.

As an aside, do you think Tatum or Brown will stick around past their current extensions if we don’t offer them the max? Maybe we should ship their greedy butts out of here too.
Again I got that you dont care about the way he left, thats on you. I have a problem with it. He did not wait he just bolted. Thats not a guy I want, I'm like KG in this regard.

Let's see what happens with Tatum and Brown before dragging them into Al's scenario.

If someone offered you a $100M+ contract and you were on the wrong side of 30 and no longer an all star player, you think it would be wise to wait on it? It’s a business man and Al did what’s best for him and his family. Not sure how you can hold that against him.
You can when it went down like it did with Horford. A guy that was already wealthy and overpaid his last contract by you. Add in the fact he engaged in tampering and didn't try to negotiate and give team time to free up money. I very much hold it against him.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #57 on: October 04, 2021, 04:46:22 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7940
  • Tommy Points: 1033
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.

I don’t know where you get this notion that signing for less money to play for a team projected to be rebuilding is something NBA players will typically do. I’d be interested if you can show me an example of a player who turned down a higher offer to be able to play for a worse team. Like, instead of playing for a contender and getting paid more, they chose to go to a rebuilding team and get paid less.

As an aside, do you think Tatum or Brown will stick around past their current extensions if we don’t offer them the max? Maybe we should ship their greedy butts out of here too.
Again I got that you dont care about the way he left, thats on you. I have a problem with it. He did not wait he just bolted. Thats not a guy I want, I'm like KG in this regard.

Let's see what happens with Tatum and Brown before dragging them into Al's scenario.

If someone offered you a $100M+ contract and you were on the wrong side of 30 and no longer an all star player, you think it would be wise to wait on it? It’s a business man and Al did what’s best for him and his family. Not sure how you can hold that against him.
You can when it went down like it did with Horford. A guy that was already wealthy and overpaid his last contract by you. Add in the fact he engaged in tampering and didn't try to negotiate and give team time to free up money. I very much hold it against him.

You're probably the only one who holds a grudge.  Also, he wasn't overpaid in his prior contract.  He played at an All-Star level, was the defensive anchor (even getting his only career All-NBA defense honor), was consistently available during the regular season, and never missed a playoff for a team that went to two conference finals in there years.  On top of that he was a terrific mentor to a team full of young players that have since become the long-term core.  He definitely held up his part of the bargain on that first deal.  Based on how the last two years have gone, I think both Al and the Celtics probably regret not working it out, but I don't think either of them are holding grudges at this point, so I don't see why you would.

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #58 on: October 04, 2021, 05:08:29 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8875
  • Tommy Points: 290
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.

I don’t know where you get this notion that signing for less money to play for a team projected to be rebuilding is something NBA players will typically do. I’d be interested if you can show me an example of a player who turned down a higher offer to be able to play for a worse team. Like, instead of playing for a contender and getting paid more, they chose to go to a rebuilding team and get paid less.

As an aside, do you think Tatum or Brown will stick around past their current extensions if we don’t offer them the max? Maybe we should ship their greedy butts out of here too.
Again I got that you dont care about the way he left, thats on you. I have a problem with it. He did not wait he just bolted. Thats not a guy I want, I'm like KG in this regard.

Let's see what happens with Tatum and Brown before dragging them into Al's scenario.

If someone offered you a $100M+ contract and you were on the wrong side of 30 and no longer an all star player, you think it would be wise to wait on it? It’s a business man and Al did what’s best for him and his family. Not sure how you can hold that against him.
You can when it went down like it did with Horford. A guy that was already wealthy and overpaid his last contract by you. Add in the fact he engaged in tampering and didn't try to negotiate and give team time to free up money. I very much hold it against him.

You're probably the only one who holds a grudge.  Also, he wasn't overpaid in his prior contract.  He played at an All-Star level, was the defensive anchor (even getting his only career All-NBA defense honor), was consistently available during the regular season, and never missed a playoff for a team that went to two conference finals in there years.  On top of that he was a terrific mentor to a team full of young players that have since become the long-term core.  He definitely held up his part of the bargain on that first deal.  Based on how the last two years have gone, I think both Al and the Celtics probably regret not working it out, but I don't think either of them are holding grudges at this point, so I don't see why you would.
If you don't think there are players and people in the organization that hold a grudge you are mistaken. There are definitely people that hold grudges for Al for what happened besides me.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2021, 05:14:30 PM by Csfan1984 »

Re: Celtics to name a team captain?
« Reply #59 on: October 04, 2021, 05:14:54 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7940
  • Tommy Points: 1033
I can't believe people want Al after he walked on this team.

Well the players understand its business at the end of the day. They can still be close friends and leave for a team that pays them more.
He didn't even give them time to consider 76ers offer. He didn't want to play with the team anymore it wasn't just money. There were reports of them being able to go higher after Kemba was officially made a sign and trade but Al bolted.
So Mr. "Flat Earth, not getting vaxed" had nothing to do with Horford's decision?  Al left a dysfunctional team and is coming back to a better one.
So a guy who can't manage turmoil when things get tough is the guy to lead?

This seems disingenuous. Philly offered a contract DA seemingly didn’t want to match. On top of that (at least coming from Embiid’s comments), Horford was signed because he was supposed to be a talent fit with Ben Simmons and this was at the height of the Philly hype and they were projected to be a contender at the time. Meanwhile, everyone was jumping ship from the C’s and we were projected to go nowhere (at least until DA scrambled to get Kemba onboard)

So really the decision for Horford was:
Option A: join a contender, play a big role, and get paid more money
Option B: take a step back, go on a semi-rebuilding year while playing for less money
There is nothing disingenuous about it you literally said he jumped ship when things got tough with option A over B. He was in a bigger roll here and the money was very close before they even made Kemba a sign and trade. If anything people here want to give him a pass for not being loyal and being apart of nothing but disappointing seasons his last two years here.

Firstly, that was Surferdad, a different poster

Secondly, if we go off Embiid’s comments, he was projected to be in a similarly large role in Philly

Thirdly, the money difference

Fourthly, C’s weren’t projected to be contenders, even with Al. Philly was a contender without him and adding him could put them over the top

Fifthly, not everybody is Deandre Jordan. When people agree to a contract, they usually push through with their verbal commitment

So no, it’s not just about “a guy jumping ship because he can’t handle turmoil”. There are so many factors that made signing with Boston easy to pass up. Where was all this loyalty talk when DA didn’t wanna sign Al for big money? And many of us (myself included) thought that Philly overpaid so we didn’t mind seeing him go. Where was our “loyalty” then?

I’d rather work with the guys who we have today. A captain is someone the locker room respects and will follow and who can call people out without it raising eyebrows because they have the “social authority” to. You think Smart’s listening to someone like Nesmith or Pritchard? You think Pritchard can tell Tatum off for going iso? Horford fits the captain criteria to a tee. The biggest downside is that he might not even be here next year because the C’s might not guarantee his contract (or will use him in a trade).
So you find a guy that values greed and an easy ride to be right for the role got it.

I don’t know where you get this notion that signing for less money to play for a team projected to be rebuilding is something NBA players will typically do. I’d be interested if you can show me an example of a player who turned down a higher offer to be able to play for a worse team. Like, instead of playing for a contender and getting paid more, they chose to go to a rebuilding team and get paid less.

As an aside, do you think Tatum or Brown will stick around past their current extensions if we don’t offer them the max? Maybe we should ship their greedy butts out of here too.
Again I got that you dont care about the way he left, thats on you. I have a problem with it. He did not wait he just bolted. Thats not a guy I want, I'm like KG in this regard.

Let's see what happens with Tatum and Brown before dragging them into Al's scenario.

If someone offered you a $100M+ contract and you were on the wrong side of 30 and no longer an all star player, you think it would be wise to wait on it? It’s a business man and Al did what’s best for him and his family. Not sure how you can hold that against him.
You can when it went down like it did with Horford. A guy that was already wealthy and overpaid his last contract by you. Add in the fact he engaged in tampering and didn't try to negotiate and give team time to free up money. I very much hold it against him.

You're probably the only one who holds a grudge.  Also, he wasn't overpaid in his prior contract.  He played at an All-Star level, was the defensive anchor (even getting his only career All-NBA defense honor), was consistently available during the regular season, and never missed a playoff for a team that went to two conference finals in there years.  On top of that he was a terrific mentor to a team full of young players that have since become the long-term core.  He definitely held up his part of the bargain on that first deal.  Based on how the last two years have gone, I think both Al and the Celtics probably regret not working it out, but I don't think either of them are holding grudges at this point, so I don't see why you would.
If you don't think there are players and people in the organization that hold a grudge you are mistaken. There are definitely people that hold griudges for Al for what happened besides me.

I’m sorry, but what player in the organization holds a grudge against Al for taking more money elsewhere?  Name him.