0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Tr1boy on March 31, 2021, 08:41:17 PMMavs look like a much more advance teamCan the Celts trade for Rick Carlisle?Would love that. Carlisle is one of the better coaches in the league and would provide so much better mentorship for our young guys over soft Boy Scout Brad.
Mavs look like a much more advance teamCan the Celts trade for Rick Carlisle?
Quote from: jpotter33 on March 31, 2021, 08:36:37 PMQuote from: liam on March 31, 2021, 08:33:46 PMOne team can shoot, one can't....Yet, somehow we've shot one more three than them. I suspect it's because their analytics nerds have told them that they aren't shooting enough threes and were taking too many midrange shots. From Jay King's article in the Athletic after the loss to the Jazz:QuoteStevens saw that the Celtics had attempted 18 more field goals than Utah. Normally, the coach suggested, that type of disparity would result in a Boston win. But not against the Jazz, who found other ways to shift the odds in their direction. In a league where the 3-point arc can mean everything, the Celtics again lagged behind top competition from that distance.“If you would have told me we took 18 more shots in the game, I would have felt pretty good about our chances,” Stevens said. “But I do think the quality of shots, as far as just from an efficiency standpoint, favored them quite a bit. As it has all year. They’ve been the best in the league at it.”The Celtics have not. For various reasons, they have not kept up with the rest of the league’s push toward embracing the 3-point arc. It’s a strange development because, under Stevens, they used to be among the league’s trendsetters in the movement. Four years ago, during Isaiah Thomas’ final season in Boston, his team ranked third in 3-point attempts per 100 possessions, trailing only James Harden’s Rockets and LeBron James’ Cavaliers in that statistic. The league has evolved a whole lot since then. More and more big men have increased their range. Many guards, following Stephen Curry’s lead, are now pulling up from well behind the line. The average team now launches almost eight more 3-pointers per game than the average team from the 2016-17 season. Even in such a rapidly transforming environment, the Celtics have regressed in their shot selection. They are actually taking fewer 3-pointers per 100 possessions this season than they did four years ago. Entering Tuesday, they ranked 18th in 3-point makes and 20th in 3-point attempts per 100 possessions. Though they rank a decent 11th in 3-point percentage, they are doing themselves a disservice by failing to use the line to greater effect. Tuesday, the Jazz outscored Boston by 27 points from behind the arc. The final score: 117-109.https://theathletic.com/2456816/2021/03/17/the-celtics-are-getting-their-shots-but-theyre-the-kind-that-leave-a-team-behind-in-the-nba/That's why we're seeing them jack it up from 3 a lot more recently.
Quote from: liam on March 31, 2021, 08:33:46 PMOne team can shoot, one can't....Yet, somehow we've shot one more three than them.
One team can shoot, one can't....
Stevens saw that the Celtics had attempted 18 more field goals than Utah. Normally, the coach suggested, that type of disparity would result in a Boston win. But not against the Jazz, who found other ways to shift the odds in their direction. In a league where the 3-point arc can mean everything, the Celtics again lagged behind top competition from that distance.“If you would have told me we took 18 more shots in the game, I would have felt pretty good about our chances,” Stevens said. “But I do think the quality of shots, as far as just from an efficiency standpoint, favored them quite a bit. As it has all year. They’ve been the best in the league at it.”The Celtics have not. For various reasons, they have not kept up with the rest of the league’s push toward embracing the 3-point arc. It’s a strange development because, under Stevens, they used to be among the league’s trendsetters in the movement. Four years ago, during Isaiah Thomas’ final season in Boston, his team ranked third in 3-point attempts per 100 possessions, trailing only James Harden’s Rockets and LeBron James’ Cavaliers in that statistic. The league has evolved a whole lot since then. More and more big men have increased their range. Many guards, following Stephen Curry’s lead, are now pulling up from well behind the line. The average team now launches almost eight more 3-pointers per game than the average team from the 2016-17 season. Even in such a rapidly transforming environment, the Celtics have regressed in their shot selection. They are actually taking fewer 3-pointers per 100 possessions this season than they did four years ago. Entering Tuesday, they ranked 18th in 3-point makes and 20th in 3-point attempts per 100 possessions. Though they rank a decent 11th in 3-point percentage, they are doing themselves a disservice by failing to use the line to greater effect. Tuesday, the Jazz outscored Boston by 27 points from behind the arc. The final score: 117-109.https://theathletic.com/2456816/2021/03/17/the-celtics-are-getting-their-shots-but-theyre-the-kind-that-leave-a-team-behind-in-the-nba/
I think we need to accept this team is likely headed to a first round exit. I mean yeah they could also miss the playoffs entirely but I think other teams are just worse (somehow).
Quote from: Silas on March 31, 2021, 08:45:44 PMMarcus and Kemba, 1 for 9 from 3s. Why won't Brad let Payton play more minutes?Really 1-8. Kemba, once again, throwing up a prayer at the buzzer at the end of the 2nd. It's bad enough when he does it in a game where is on fire, but when he is shooting this poory, it just makes his bad percentage even worse. I really wish the ball would be in somebody else's hands at the ends of quarters for a change - the dude can't help but shoot it.
Marcus and Kemba, 1 for 9 from 3s. Why won't Brad let Payton play more minutes?
Quote from: jpotter33 on March 31, 2021, 08:44:29 PMQuote from: Tr1boy on March 31, 2021, 08:41:17 PMMavs look like a much more advance teamCan the Celts trade for Rick Carlisle?Would love that. Carlisle is one of the better coaches in the league and would provide so much better mentorship for our young guys over soft Boy Scout Brad.Rick Carlisle is a 60 year old Brad Stevens. Difference is he's had a top 5 NBA player his entire career. I'm not defending Brad because quite frankly he's sucked a fat egg these last 2 seasons but Rick is probably his closest comparison.
Quote from: liam on March 31, 2021, 08:47:48 PMWalker and Smart are a predicable 4-17. Pritchard has 5 points on 2 shots. Do you think Brad watches the game? He can't be seeing something practice cause there is no practice. What is he watching?It feels like he sticks hard to his game plan rotations and never adjusts to how players are actually performing.
Walker and Smart are a predicable 4-17. Pritchard has 5 points on 2 shots. Do you think Brad watches the game? He can't be seeing something practice cause there is no practice. What is he watching?
Quote from: Tr1boy on March 31, 2021, 08:42:05 PMQuote from: Ogaju on March 31, 2021, 08:41:14 PMDid Cs have a chance at Docic?They did perhaps. Kings maybe make a trade with CeltsNo, we didn't. We would have had the 8th pick in the draft if we didn't trade for Kyrie. We had no chance, you're just guessing what might have happened
Quote from: Ogaju on March 31, 2021, 08:41:14 PMDid Cs have a chance at Docic?They did perhaps. Kings maybe make a trade with Celts
Did Cs have a chance at Docic?
Porzingis really looks like a shadow of his former self. He should be destroying us with the 3rd string big men we've been throwing at him.
There is seriously no reason to think that making the playoffs would be better for the future of the franchise than simply resting guys heavily the remainder of the season and getting a top 12 pick......................
Quote from: gouki88 on March 31, 2021, 08:46:41 PMQuote from: Tr1boy on March 31, 2021, 08:42:05 PMQuote from: Ogaju on March 31, 2021, 08:41:14 PMDid Cs have a chance at Docic?They did perhaps. Kings maybe make a trade with CeltsNo, we didn't. We would have had the 8th pick in the draft if we didn't trade for Kyrie. We had no chance, you're just guessing what might have happenedI'am. But if Celts offered Brown and 8th for 2ndI wonder if Kings would have bit on thatAnyways the question was if Celts had a shot. Hindsight