Author Topic: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine  (Read 11691 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #45 on: November 06, 2019, 11:44:49 AM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
No mention of Hayward's big night on ESPN.

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #46 on: November 06, 2019, 11:53:57 AM »

Offline dannyboy35

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2041
  • Tommy Points: 110
  What do they live in Boston or something? There’s a faction of boson fans who dug their heels in really good that Hayward stinks. These are the kind of fans that boast about the Pats to other cities when we are losing though. Weirdos.
   Die hards know Hayward is a super skilled player.

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #47 on: November 06, 2019, 12:08:17 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Last time someone went 16-16 from two range it was Wilt in 1967. That's news!

ESPN's top headline: Kuzma takes over in 4th, keys Lakers' comeback
« Last Edit: November 06, 2019, 12:15:12 PM by liam »

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #48 on: November 06, 2019, 12:39:26 PM »

Online DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6755
  • Tommy Points: 810
Last time someone went 16-16 from two range it was Wilt in 1967. That's news!

ESPN's top headline: Kuzma takes over in 4th, keys Lakers' comeback

I know. The anti-Boston bias is quite ridiculous. If we had flashier, more interesting characters, it might be different. But the Celtics are only good at basketball--how boring is that?

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #49 on: November 06, 2019, 12:56:09 PM »

Offline RMO

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1176
  • Tommy Points: 111
Last time someone went 16-16 from two range it was Wilt in 1967. That's news!

ESPN's top headline: Kuzma takes over in 4th, keys Lakers' comeback

I know. The anti-Boston bias is quite ridiculous. If we had flashier, more interesting characters, it might be different. But the Celtics are only good at basketball--how boring is that?

Not sure it's an anti-Boston bias as much as it is just desperation by the national media for the lakers to be relevant again.  Nauseating nonetheless.

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #50 on: November 06, 2019, 04:04:27 PM »

Offline iadera

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 964
  • Tommy Points: 74
  • CroCeltics
It is great to see GH doing this. The best news is that we have a few guys that can do the same thing. I would just add Adams to this team. And one more thing, Edwards is a real steal of the draft. Happy to see him so fearless knocking down those shots.
Adams is too expensive for our liking.
We can get him only if we trade Smart (+others) and that is where the conversation ends.

Not Smart. But Brown? I would say yes.

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #51 on: November 06, 2019, 04:33:17 PM »

Offline bellerephon

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 665
  • Tommy Points: 52
Last time someone went 16-16 from two range it was Wilt in 1967. That's news!

ESPN's top headline: Kuzma takes over in 4th, keys Lakers' comeback
I actually don't think it's all that big of a news story nationally. Hayward did miss some shots, it's just that they were threes. There were no threes back in Wilt's day, he didn't miss a shot in that game, it's not the same thing. Gordon had a great night, but let's not try to make it some kind of all-time performance that will go down in history.

Re: Hayward takes a step back and allows other to shine
« Reply #52 on: November 06, 2019, 04:50:07 PM »

Offline keevsnick

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6704
  • Tommy Points: 651
It is great to see GH doing this. The best news is that we have a few guys that can do the same thing. I would just add Adams to this team. And one more thing, Edwards is a real steal of the draft. Happy to see him so fearless knocking down those shots.
Adams is too expensive for our liking.
We can get him only if we trade Smart (+others) and that is where the conversation ends.

Not Smart. But Brown? I would say yes.

Then you wouldn't last long as a GM.