So while we have Biden acting like he didn't know anything about Hunter, feigning ignorance, we now have leaked testimony from George Kent that he did warn the Biden camp about Hunter and the problem he presented in being with Burisma to the efforts of what the US was trying to accomplish with Ukraine.
Of course, the spin was that his other son was dealing with brain cancer, so let's ignore indiscretions.
At the same time, we have a congressman claiming that the context of that testimony wasn't about Hunter, which again brings us the point of, what can we believe about the leaks, particularly without the proper context to accompany them, and even if those that want to spin the testimonies to their favor if they're being truthful about said context.
Which again brings me to the point of, man, I hate leaks.
But who cares...https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics/diplomat-george-kent-testifies-hunter-biden-ukraine/index.html