I'm confused - why would anybody here take Adams over Capella?
Capella put up superior numbers, is about on par defensively, has pretty much the same limitations as Adams, and his salary is $10m cheaper. What am I missing?
Originally I wanted Capela, but seeing that Vuce is in the market, why not go for him. I feel like Vucevic is the second best big man behind Anthony Davis in our list of targets for bigs.
Oh, I agree.
I don't feel confident enough in the amount of proven offensive production that we have right now, so I'd much rather take Vucevic.
But if (for aguments sake) Vucevic signs in Orlando or LA, and we really need a big, then I'd lean towrds Capella over Adams.
if Vucevic isn't available then I also wouldn't put it past Danny to go young and take a run at Julius Randle.
Randle is only 24 years old and has already put up a season of 21 / 9 / 3 on 52% shooting. A trio of Brown/Tatum/Randle could form one of the more promising young cores in the NBA - and Boston still has the Memphis pick which could potentially be used in a trade or could bring in another elite prospect next year or the year after.
Even if Danny decides to bring back Rozier - the athleticism of that lineup (Rozier, Brown, Tatum, Randle) would be incredible. That would be one hell of a fast break team, and a ton of fun to watch - even if it may not be a title contender for another couple of years. Pelicans are looking to win now - wonder if they would concider working a sign and trade, Randle for Hayward?
Then we could add Randle without taking up any of our cap (actually we'd free up a few million extra and could probably still add Vucevic).