Utah sign and trade proposal

[emilgold]

Was Thinking about the following sign & trade with Utah:
Boston out:
S&T Olynyk @ 18M (can structure as descending salary in case price is too steep for Utah)
Bradley 8.8M
Rozier 2M
Yabusele 1.9M
Mickey 1.5M
Jackson 1.4M
Total 33.5M outgoing

Utah out:
S&T Hayward @ 29.8M
Favors 12M
Total 41.8M outgoing

Trades works as Boston can take up to 125% of the outgoing money (41.9M)

why for Utah:
about to lose Hayward anyway. Favors doesn't fit with Gobert and has 1 year contract, will be too expensive to keep him next year. get Bradley who will fit seamlessly with Rubio and gobert, Olynyk who complements Gobert well and a couple of nice additional assets (Gershon and Rozier)

Why for Boston:
 about to lose Bradley anyway and have to clear the wings logjam. solves the Rebounding/bigs problem without giving up significant future assets

What do you think? would Utah do it? I think it works great for Boston

[Jvalin]

TP for your first post! Welcome aboard!

I just have a quick question if anyone knows.

93. What is "Base Year Compensation?" How does it affect trades?

(...) The rules formerly known as BYC now apply under just one circumstance -- during sign-and-trade transactions (see question number 92). If a team re-signs its Larry Bird or Early Bird free agent in order to trade the player in a sign-and-trade transaction, the player's new salary is greater than the minimum, he receives a raise greater than 20%, and the team is at or above the cap immediately after the signing*, then the player's outgoing salary for trade purposes is either his previous salary or 50% of his new salary, whichever is greater. The team receiving the player always uses his new salary.


*The team salary being over the cap immediately following the signing is what triggers this rule. It does not matter whether the team was under the cap prior to the signing, nor whether the team is under the cap subsequent to the trade.

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q93

Does this mean that if we sign Olynyk for 18 million, his outgoing salary for trade purposes will be 9 million? Or could we trade him using his new salary because we would still be under the cap following the signing of his new contract?