0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
43m43 minutes agoRick Bonnell ?@rick_bonnellI am told the @hornets will also end up with Jeremy Lamb in a separate deal involving Matt Barnes' contract. Barnes isn't going to OKC.
They want a draft pick, could we not send #28 for Lamb? Then perhaps use Lamb as leverage to get the #9 pick from Charlotte, obviously with other pieces. Just seems like an opportunity for Danny to pounce...
Quote from: TheSundanceKid on June 25, 2015, 05:51:25 AMThey want a draft pick, could we not send #28 for Lamb? Then perhaps use Lamb as leverage to get the #9 pick from Charlotte, obviously with other pieces. Just seems like an opportunity for Danny to pounce...My guess is that Ainge values #28 more than Lamb and values the cap space he would lose by trading that pick for Lamb's $3 million due next season because Plan A is improving the team through free agency.
Quote from: LooseCannon on June 25, 2015, 07:30:04 AMQuote from: TheSundanceKid on June 25, 2015, 05:51:25 AMThey want a draft pick, could we not send #28 for Lamb? Then perhaps use Lamb as leverage to get the #9 pick from Charlotte, obviously with other pieces. Just seems like an opportunity for Danny to pounce...My guess is that Ainge values #28 more than Lamb and values the cap space he would lose by trading that pick for Lamb's $3 million due next season because Plan A is improving the team through free agency.I suppose thats fair. But he would be trading for him with the intention of moving him tonight. A nice young player with potential. Perhaps we coould then do Olynyk, Lamb and #16 for #9. Or even just Lamb, #16 and #33 for #9?
Quote from: TheSundanceKid on June 25, 2015, 08:27:31 AMQuote from: LooseCannon on June 25, 2015, 07:30:04 AMQuote from: TheSundanceKid on June 25, 2015, 05:51:25 AMThey want a draft pick, could we not send #28 for Lamb? Then perhaps use Lamb as leverage to get the #9 pick from Charlotte, obviously with other pieces. Just seems like an opportunity for Danny to pounce...My guess is that Ainge values #28 more than Lamb and values the cap space he would lose by trading that pick for Lamb's $3 million due next season because Plan A is improving the team through free agency.I suppose thats fair. But he would be trading for him with the intention of moving him tonight. A nice young player with potential. Perhaps we coould then do Olynyk, Lamb and #16 for #9. Or even just Lamb, #16 and #33 for #9?If that were the plan, you would try to arrange a three-way deal instead of making one trade and risk getting stuck with Lamb and his contract.
Quote from: LooseCannon on June 25, 2015, 08:51:14 AMQuote from: TheSundanceKid on June 25, 2015, 08:27:31 AMQuote from: LooseCannon on June 25, 2015, 07:30:04 AMQuote from: TheSundanceKid on June 25, 2015, 05:51:25 AMThey want a draft pick, could we not send #28 for Lamb? Then perhaps use Lamb as leverage to get the #9 pick from Charlotte, obviously with other pieces. Just seems like an opportunity for Danny to pounce...My guess is that Ainge values #28 more than Lamb and values the cap space he would lose by trading that pick for Lamb's $3 million due next season because Plan A is improving the team through free agency.I suppose thats fair. But he would be trading for him with the intention of moving him tonight. A nice young player with potential. Perhaps we coould then do Olynyk, Lamb and #16 for #9. Or even just Lamb, #16 and #33 for #9?If that were the plan, you would try to arrange a three-way deal instead of making one trade and risk getting stuck with Lamb and his contract.I could be wrong but isn't there a rule that you can't trade a player you just acquired in a trade in combination with another player without a specific delay (90 days?)?