Author Topic: Justise Winslow idea  (Read 1148 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Justise Winslow idea
« on: May 15, 2015, 10:12:13 AM »

Offline Humble G

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1442
  • Tommy Points: 983
Ok so I had an idea from the "pacers..swap #11" thread which led me to this idea....

A.) Trade Bradley, #16 and #45 for Pacers #11 pick

B.) then trade the #11 pick, clippers #28 pick, # 33 and Sully to Magic for #5 and hopefully draft Winslow.

C.) Somehow get Cousins for like 6 future firsts lol

Reasoning:
pacers interested in Payne and could possibly get him with our #16. Bradley would fit nice beside PG imo.....if they wanted a future first instead of #45...I'd prly do it

Magic have interviewed kaminksy so maybe they think about moving down to #11 and they also like Mackey from LSU which could be had with #33 pick. Finally I think Sully would really round out a young promising team:
PG: Payton
SG: Olidipo
SF: Harris(resign), harkless, Aaron Gordon(play sf and pf)
PF: Sully,  Nicholson, Mackey??
C: Vucevic, Kaminksy

Celtics would have
PG: Smart/IT4
SG: Turner/FA
SF: Winslow/crowder
PF: KO/jerebko
C:Zeller....but hopefully we get cousins for like 6 future draft picks lol


Realistic? Thoughts?
« Last Edit: May 15, 2015, 12:13:10 PM by Humble G »

Re: Justise Winslow idea
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2015, 10:16:42 AM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8734
  • Tommy Points: 855
I think we slightly overpay for 11 and underpay for 5
AB for 11 is pretty fair but doesn't make so much sense for Indy

Re: Justise Winslow idea
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2015, 10:21:03 AM »

Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145
I think we slightly overpay for 11 and underpay for 5
AB for 11 is pretty fair but doesn't make so much sense for Indy

I agree with this. I think more realistic might be:

AB + #45 for #11 (maybe match salary)
#11, #16, Bkn '16, Sully for Winslow.

It's tough to do the double-move-up because most teams don't want to trade their pick before seeing who's available, but it's a good idea.

Re: Justise Winslow idea
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2015, 12:11:37 PM »

Offline Humble G

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1442
  • Tommy Points: 983
I think we slightly overpay for 11 and underpay for 5
AB for 11 is pretty fair but doesn't make so much sense for Indy

I agree with this. I think more realistic might be:

AB + #45 for #11 (maybe match salary)
#11, #16, Bkn '16, Sully for Winslow.

It's tough to do the double-move-up because most teams don't want to trade their pick before seeing who's available, but it's a good idea.

Yea it is tough to do a double move, i agree...really like winslow just seems outta reach.....as I'm starting to think we might be giving up too much for him...bradley, sully, 16, 45, and a future first....thats alot


Side note i do think bradley would be great beside paul george. good 3pointer, can slash, and great defender. doesn't need to handle the ball as it would be going thru PG.