Harabalos remarked on twitter that it wasn't a great idea the Celtics beat the Cavs by 40. Can't get to the tweet now, but said something like "I saw Boston maybe winning one of 2 in CLE but not after this."
Anyone buy into this?
I thought the same thing. Why poke the bear when you're very possibly going to see them in a series coming up?
What was the alternative? The C's played everyone on their bench (except Wallace, I think). I don't want the Celtics, on the court, playing any other way than their best...ever! Sure, it *might* give the Cavs some extra incentive to play hard in a possible future playoff series, but frankly I doubt it. They should be all be playing *hard* all the time, irregardless.