Poll

If you're building a team from scratch, do you start with Rondo or Noah?

Rondo
Noah

Author Topic: Rondo or Noah?  (Read 6226 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Rondo or Noah?
« Reply #30 on: November 07, 2014, 03:36:29 PM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4965
  • Tommy Points: 433
Noah for the simple fact that his position is harder to fill and his skill set is easier to fit pieces around.
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: Rondo or Noah?
« Reply #31 on: November 07, 2014, 04:10:34 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Rondo.
Noah is good but not a great talent he just plays hard. 10pts/11rebs/2ast/1.5 blk doesn't scream special center. 12pts/5rebs/12ast/1.5stl sure is special for a PG. If Rondo was only a better ft% shooter this wouldn't even be debatable.
Noah IS a great talent. To verify this, you could start by checking how many players in recent history have posted multiple seasons averaging a double-double with at least 4 assists, 1 steal and 1.5 block (hint: not that many).
« Last Edit: November 07, 2014, 04:16:43 PM by kozlodoev »
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Rondo or Noah?
« Reply #32 on: November 07, 2014, 05:17:52 PM »

Offline Mr October

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6129
  • Tommy Points: 247
I'd easily take Noah. Defensive player of the year centers are rare. It is easier to find a solid starting point guard. There are at least 20 of them in the NBA today that can beat the others on any given night.

Re: Rondo or Noah?
« Reply #33 on: November 07, 2014, 05:42:52 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
Noah for the simple fact that his position is harder to fill and his skill set is easier to fit pieces around.

I agree his position is the hardest to fill, but how can the guy who's completely inept at scoring from any distance be easier to fit pieces around?  Both teams would have a great rebounder, both teams would need shooters around them, and both teams would need a big that can score.  The most significant difference between the two teams is that Rondo's starts out with a HUGE advantage offensively, no matter who you put around him.
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: Rondo or Noah?
« Reply #34 on: November 07, 2014, 05:47:42 PM »

Offline aingeforthree

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2013
  • Tommy Points: 134
Rondo.... Not even close.

Nobody can quarterback the point position like Rondo.

Guys like Carmelo, Lebron, know the game. They know just how valuable Rondo is. He's the best quarterback point man in the game. He makes everyone around him better.

Not only does Melo & LeBron know this, we're lucky our gm knows it as well. Unless some team is willing to give up 3 all star commodities for Rondo, Ainge isn't budging. He's worth far more on the court for anything less, & his recruiting off the court will prove just as valuable.

There's a [dang] good reason guys like Bron & Melo want Rondo running shop.

Re: Rondo or Noah?
« Reply #35 on: November 08, 2014, 07:29:59 PM »

Offline smokeablount

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3464
  • Tommy Points: 654
  • Mark Blount often got smoked
Noah for the simple fact that his position is harder to fill and his skill set is easier to fit pieces around.

I agree his position is the hardest to fill, but how can the guy who's completely inept at scoring from any distance be easier to fit pieces around?  Both teams would have a great rebounder, both teams would need shooters around them, and both teams would need a big that can score.  The most significant difference between the two teams is that Rondo's starts out with a HUGE advantage offensively, no matter who you put around him.

Because as a C who can cover his man and collapse the paint simultaneously, Noah makes much more of a defensive impact than Rondo, who can really only stop the ball at the top and clog passing lanes if only he didn't then roam and end up playing matador D and swiping with his hands more than moving his feet. 

Also, neither Noah or Rondo can shoot, but Noah is going to be 8 feet from the hoop unless he's dropping 6 assists a game from the high post running the whole offense like half of last season for a playoff team.  So Noah can score on putbacks, grab offensive boards while still keeping in ideal position and not jeopardizing running back on D, and he only has to shoot from 8 feet out.  Rondo can't shoot, but he has to be at the 3 point line.  He has many skills to account for this, but Noah and Rondo not being able to shoot similarly do not have similar effects on a team.

For these reasons, filling the team is easier.  3 + D guys are the fastest growing commodities in the league now (look at what we signed James Posey for in '07, then look what Jimmy Butler admitted a better and younger but similarly skilled player, gets this year), you need those with Rondo because you gave up Noah the rim protector.  With Noah, you can spend 40% of that cost on a great shooter who's just a decent help defender (Korver an alpha dog example of this) and then you have cap $ for a legit max player to pair because of how Noah's skills allow you to save money at other positions for a big splurge, and because you already found your C.
CelticsBlog 25 Fantasy Draft Champ/Commish - OKC Thunder:
PG: SGA (24-25, MVP)
SG: Klay Thompson (14-15)
SF: Kevin Durant (13-14, MVP)
PF: Evan Mobley (24-25, DPOY)
C: Rudy Gobert (18-19, DPOY)
B: JKidd, Vince, KAT, Siakam, Bam, Rose (MVP), Danny Green