Who deserves more minutes, Bayless or Brooks?

[gar]

Per 36:

Wallace 5.5 / 9.2
Brooks 9.4 / 15.3

[hwangjini_1]

Per 36:

Wallace 5.5 / 9.2
Brooks 9.4 / 15.3

and....

let's keep in mind that this season brooks has logged a total of 73 minutes spread over 10 games. sss makes me wonder about the value of the stats above.

per 36 for his first two seasons (a total of 2,560 minutes) he averaged about 4.2 rebounds a game.

nothing to write home about.

[Smutzy#9]

I agree Just bench wallace and give brooks the time. Wallace has just been utterly disgusting out there.

This is what i want our starting 5 too look like at some point.

Rondo
AB
Jeff
Sully
Asik

Our backups

Bayless
Brooks/crawf
Brooks/wallace
Kelly
Fav

send pressey to the d league. I dont actually think i have seen  that kid MAKE a jump shot all season. Bayless is just a better option. Yes the defence wont be as good as the starting 5. But you send those guys out there and thats a bench that could give you 40 on a given night. Granted they may give up 40 as well. This team struggled with bench production during the doc era. Got the chance to have something decent. Make them run and gun balls to the wall offence to maybe tire some opponents out.

[pokeKingCurtis]

Per 36:

Wallace 5.5 / 9.2
Brooks 9.4 / 15.3

and....

let's keep in mind that this season brooks has logged a total of 73 minutes spread over 10 games. sss makes me wonder about the value of the stats above.

per 36 for his first two seasons (a total of 2,560 minutes) he averaged about 4.2 rebounds a game.

nothing to write home about.

I really hate that Brooks doesn't do anything else but score. Kind of like Jeff Green of the old except far worse since Brooks is ball stopping and doesn't defend at all (unless the past 4 games of aggressive rebounding and aggressive defense and energy are anomalies for JG...which would suck).

Still. I wouldn't be surprised if Brooks makes the team look more bearable, hell, he might even improve the team.

And Gerald Wallace is in for defense and energy. But lately he's been sleeping on D and bringing less energy (slept on Jared Dudley and Harrison Barnes on 3's, was ugly).

And, hell, against Houston Brooks looked halfway decent. Might be wishful thinking but his defense and effort looked better and he stopped the ball less.

I thought Keith Bogans actually played pretty well, too, and brought more than Crash did.

Don't really care whether Stevens plays Brooks or Bogans. Bench Wallace. I thought Crash was supposed to be a consummate professional. Getting real tired of your Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline. Wallace.

[gar]

Danny agrees. Bayless it is

[pearljammer10]

Danny agrees. Bayless it is

And it was definitely Bayless before the trade as well.

[chenaren]

Both are one dimensional scorers, but Brooks has so much more skills. He just needs some opportunities.

[Celtics18]

I say Brooks.