Author Topic: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly  (Read 6606 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« on: August 03, 2012, 05:41:33 PM »

Offline Kane3387

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8269
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Intensity!!!
Hollinger  on Celtics. We are one of the good.

Quote
Boston Celtics


Even though I hate the Jeff Green deal with every fiber of my being, Boston's offseason was so good in other respects that I have to put them here. For all the angst over Allen's departure, the Celtics' ability to put together a creative sign-and-trade for Courtney Lee effectively made it a moot point; Lee is younger, defends better, shoots 40 percent on 3-pointers and costs less than what they had offered Allen.

The Celtics also got some much-needed bench scoring by picking up Jason Terry with their midlevel exception -- something made possible by inking Kevin Garnett to a cap-friendly deal that will keep them below the tax apron -- and then rounded things out by keeping Brandon Bass and stocking the bench with some solid minimum deals (Jason Collins, Chris Wilcox, Keyon Dooling). First-rounder Jared Sullinger looks like a keeper, too.

The one negative was the Green deal, which is believed to be four years, $32 million -- far too much for a player who has proven fairly replaceable in his first four seasons and missed the fifth with a heart problem. Nonetheless, Boston, against all odds, seems primed for yet one more run.


http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8224707/good-bad-ugly-2012-nba-offseason


KG: "Dude.... What is up with yo shorts?!"

CBD_2016 Cavs Remaining Picks - 14.14

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2012, 05:52:31 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13796
  • Tommy Points: 2065
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Hollinger  on Celtics. We are one of the good.

Quote
Boston Celtics


Even though I hate the Jeff Green deal with every fiber of my being, Boston's offseason was so good in other respects that I have to put them here. For all the angst over Allen's departure, the Celtics' ability to put together a creative sign-and-trade for Courtney Lee effectively made it a moot point; Lee is younger, defends better, shoots 40 percent on 3-pointers and costs less than what they had offered Allen.

The Celtics also got some much-needed bench scoring by picking up Jason Terry with their midlevel exception -- something made possible by inking Kevin Garnett to a cap-friendly deal that will keep them below the tax apron -- and then rounded things out by keeping Brandon Bass and stocking the bench with some solid minimum deals (Jason Collins, Chris Wilcox, Keyon Dooling). First-rounder Jared Sullinger looks like a keeper, too.

The one negative was the Green deal, which is believed to be four years, $32 million -- far too much for a player who has proven fairly replaceable in his first four seasons and missed the fifth with a heart problem. Nonetheless, Boston, against all odds, seems primed for yet one more run.


http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8224707/good-bad-ugly-2012-nba-offseason


Thanks for the post...has something changed on the terms of the Jeff Green Deal? It has always been reported as being $36M.

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2012, 06:06:43 PM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
Hollinger  on Celtics. We are one of the good.

Quote
Boston Celtics


Even though I hate the Jeff Green deal with every fiber of my being, Boston's offseason was so good in other respects that I have to put them here. For all the angst over Allen's departure, the Celtics' ability to put together a creative sign-and-trade for Courtney Lee effectively made it a moot point; Lee is younger, defends better, shoots 40 percent on 3-pointers and costs less than what they had offered Allen.

The Celtics also got some much-needed bench scoring by picking up Jason Terry with their midlevel exception -- something made possible by inking Kevin Garnett to a cap-friendly deal that will keep them below the tax apron -- and then rounded things out by keeping Brandon Bass and stocking the bench with some solid minimum deals (Jason Collins, Chris Wilcox, Keyon Dooling). First-rounder Jared Sullinger looks like a keeper, too.

The one negative was the Green deal, which is believed to be four years, $32 million -- far too much for a player who has proven fairly replaceable in his first four seasons and missed the fifth with a heart problem. Nonetheless, Boston, against all odds, seems primed for yet one more run.


http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8224707/good-bad-ugly-2012-nba-offseason


Thanks for the post...has something changed on the terms of the Jeff Green Deal? It has always been reported as being $36M.
Yeah, found that interesting maybe that's the hold up and Green wants 36?
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2012, 08:53:24 PM »

Offline masteremile123

  • Luke Garza
  • Posts: 92
  • Tommy Points: 10
I don't get it with the jeff green thing . I know the guy didn't play well his time here and he had heart problems last year. BUT this guy was our only option , its not like we can go and sign someone else for less money . Its either this team with jeff green or without jeff green and if being with jeff green means 9 mil for 4 years than so be it we are over the cap for 3 of those years anyway .

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2012, 09:15:21 PM »

Offline Kane3387

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8269
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Intensity!!!
I don't get it with the jeff green thing . I know the guy didn't play well his time here and he had heart problems last year. BUT this guy was our only option , its not like we can go and sign someone else for less money . Its either this team with jeff green or without jeff green and if being with jeff green means 9 mil for 4 years than so be it we are over the cap for 3 of those years anyway .

I agree.


KG: "Dude.... What is up with yo shorts?!"

CBD_2016 Cavs Remaining Picks - 14.14

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2012, 09:49:45 PM »

Offline GreenEnvy

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4675
  • Tommy Points: 1043
I don't get the overreaction to the Green deal either. He is not a superstar, but he's not getting paid max money either. Some people are acting like we just gave him a Joe Johnson contract.

$9 million per. That's worthy of hating with every fiber of your being? I can probably name a handleful of worse contracts this offseason and loads of them the past decade.

The guy is a proven 15ppg scorer as a third option. He can hit corner threes, create his own shot (look for him to post up more against SF's), and is a good defender. Is he even in the top 50 highest paid players?

But this is Hollinger, so yeah.
CELTICS 2024

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2012, 11:34:24 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
While I agree with Hollinger said about us having another run, I disagree with his Jeff Green thing.

Sure he's overpaid, but not vastly, and he's a very good pick up for us. A starting level SF who comes off the bench, while a bit overpaid, is fine by me.
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2012, 12:02:21 AM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
I don't get the overreaction to the Green deal either. He is not a superstar, but he's not getting paid max money either. Some people are acting like we just gave him a Joe Johnson contract.

$9 million per. That's worthy of hating with every fiber of your being? I can probably name a handleful of worse contracts this offseason and loads of them the past decade.

The guy is a proven 15ppg scorer as a third option. He can hit corner threes, create his own shot (look for him to post up more against SF's), and is a good defender. Is he even in the top 50 highest paid players?

But this is Hollinger, so yeah.

TP. Interesting that he said 32/4 though instead of 36/4. typo perhaps?
- LilRip

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2012, 01:22:48 AM »

Offline blastoidesroidsnoids

  • Neemias Queta
  • Posts: 189
  • Tommy Points: 21
Hollinger is ugly, bad at his job and good at being a doofus.

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2012, 02:23:11 AM »

Offline GreenEnvy

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4675
  • Tommy Points: 1043
I don't get the overreaction to the Green deal either. He is not a superstar, but he's not getting paid max money either. Some people are acting like we just gave him a Joe Johnson contract.

$9 million per. That's worthy of hating with every fiber of your being? I can probably name a handleful of worse contracts this offseason and loads of them the past decade.

The guy is a proven 15ppg scorer as a third option. He can hit corner threes, create his own shot (look for him to post up more against SF's), and is a good defender. Is he even in the top 50 highest paid players?

But this is Hollinger, so yeah.

TP. Interesting that he said 32/4 though instead of 36/4. typo perhaps?

Not sure if it is a typo or if their are conflicting details.

But the only people I heard $32M from was Simmons and now Hollinger. One is a sports fan and the other is a statistician. I trust neither compared to the many reputable sources that have reported $36M.
CELTICS 2024

Re: Hollinger on Good, Bad, and Ugly
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2012, 03:08:22 AM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
32 feels friendlier and more reasonable. Green has the ability, I've just never seen him play with fire. If he amps it up about 4.6 notches, I think we will be very happy with his production. He's smart, skilled, a good locker room guy... just has to get angry and play like it for us to be a serious, serious threat this year. No idea if he's got it in him - kinda makes it exciting, yeah? - but I sure as **** hope so.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2012, 03:18:17 AM by tarheelsxxiii »
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC