Author Topic: JO on C's...  (Read 12060 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: JO on C's...
« Reply #45 on: July 17, 2012, 09:04:00 PM »

Offline KGs Knee

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12765
  • Tommy Points: 1546
So JO is considering playing for the Lakers, eh?  Says he didn't like his role here.

TRAITOR!!!

How dare he ditch us for our worst enemy!

Oh wait, nevermind this is JO we're talking about. Didn't even know dude was still alive.

Hahahahahahahahahaha!

Re: JO on C's...
« Reply #46 on: July 17, 2012, 09:04:20 PM »

Offline CelticHooligan3

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1073
  • Tommy Points: 130
man get dis outta shape bloated, no knee, bad back, plastic hip, sore wrist delusional has been tf outta here. he wanted to score more are u kiddin me? bruh countless times Rondo would penetrate nd give u wide open midrange jumpers nd layups nd almost EVERY time u would leave it short. u made layups look extremely complicated nd a 39 year old Shaq looked better then u for nearly $5 mil less. dis aint da Pacers days brothaman u aint a 20/10 player in 2012.




This. TP.

Re: JO on C's...
« Reply #47 on: July 17, 2012, 09:06:43 PM »

Offline esel1000

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11547
  • Tommy Points: 587
man get dis outta shape bloated, no knee, bad back, plastic hip, sore wrist delusional has been tf outta here. he wanted to score more are u kiddin me? bruh countless times Rondo would penetrate nd give u wide open midrange jumpers nd layups nd almost EVERY time u would leave it short. u made layups look extremely complicated nd a 39 year old Shaq looked better then u for nearly $5 mil less. dis aint da Pacers days brothaman u aint a 20/10 player in 2012.




This. TP.

Double this. I hope the Lakers are dumb enough to sign him...

Re: JO on C's...
« Reply #48 on: July 17, 2012, 09:17:58 PM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
He's signing for the vet min. If he gives anything - and he's still a beast on defense - it'll be worth it.

I think he's a scrub as much as anyone else. But the guy was our enforcer (when there) in the middle after Perk, and he seemed to like hurting people. Who can argue with that for the min?

People are suggesting we sign Darko, for some perspective... I'm not suggesting it's a good move to sign him, but it's no worse than Darko.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2012, 09:23:29 PM by tarheelsxxiii »
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC

Re: JO on C's...
« Reply #49 on: July 17, 2012, 09:21:35 PM »

Offline Celts Fan 92

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1423
  • Tommy Points: 122
So JO is considering playing for the Lakers, eh?  Says he didn't like his role here.

TRAITOR!!!

How dare he ditch us for our worst enemy!

Oh wait, nevermind this is JO we're talking about. Didn't even know dude was still alive.

Hahahahahahahahahaha!
co-sign lol dis is equivalent to da Troy Murphy signing last year. washed up flabby nd sick former celtic forwards who are shells of their former selves nd look 10 years older then they really are. the corpse of JO wont have a positive impact on ANY team in 2012

Re: JO on C's...
« Reply #50 on: July 17, 2012, 09:36:33 PM »

Offline thirstyboots18

  • Chat Moderator
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8791
  • Tommy Points: 2584
if he was good enough for the celtics....oh, wait....he is too good for the lakers.  ha ha ha
Yesterday is history.
Tomorrow is a mystery.
Today is a gift...
   That is why it is called the present.
Visit the CelticsBlog Live Game Chat!