Author Topic: some more unbelievable Miami stats  (Read 1880 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

some more unbelievable Miami stats
« on: May 29, 2012, 11:57:38 AM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Heat Tech fouls in post season     =  6
Heat opponent techs in post season = 22

Quote
Stat of the night from @Gary_Tanguay: MIA opp hit for 22 techs in playoffs. Heat, just 6. #celticstalk



In a 6 game series Lebron committed a total of 5 fouls . 5 FOULS IN 6 GAMES AGAINST DANNY GRANGER

http://espn.go.com/nba/player/gamelog/_/id/1966/lebron-james


Yup there is no bias for the Miami heat at all

Re: some more unbelievable Miami stats
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2012, 11:59:10 AM »

Offline esel1000

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11547
  • Tommy Points: 587
Well Lebron is the 2nd coming of Jesus to the NBA and does David Stern just love that guy or what??

Re: some more unbelievable Miami stats
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2012, 12:07:42 PM »

Offline 33-00-32

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2792
  • Tommy Points: 2746
  • 2012 PAPTBG & 2013 PAPOUG CHAMPION
Heat Tech fouls in post season     =  6
Heat opponent techs in post season = 22

Quote
Stat of the night from @Gary_Tanguay: MIA opp hit for 22 techs in playoffs. Heat, just 6. #celticstalk



In a 6 game series Lebron committed a total of 5 fouls . 5 FOULS IN 6 GAMES AGAINST DANNY GRANGER

http://espn.go.com/nba/player/gamelog/_/id/1966/lebron-james


Yup there is no bias for the Miami heat at all

Congrats on 5000 and thanks for the stats. I thought it was 23 and 4 but the point is the same. TP
G:Kemba,Payton,Hairston,Henderson,Lin
F:Parker,MKG,Budinger,Mirotic,Salmons
C:R.Lopez,Biyombo,Hickson
Coach: Shaka Smart
Rights to: Bog Bog


Re: some more unbelievable Miami stats
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2012, 12:12:59 PM »

Offline CelticHooligan3

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1073
  • Tommy Points: 130
This is the same team with Haslem admitting that dirty foul on Hanborough was retribution for Wade. Not to mention Dexter Pittmans hatchet job. This team has basically had the red carpet unfurled for them by the league on their way to the finals.

This is a hard enough series for the Celtics without referees influencing the game. But with their help forget it. We don't stand a chance. That stat by Tanguay needs to be sent to every GM in the league. At some point the rubber needs to hit the road.

Re: some more unbelievable Miami stats
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2012, 12:23:42 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20138
  • Tommy Points: 1335
Fix is on.

Quote
This is the same team with Haslem admitting that dirty foul on Hanborough was retribution for Wade. Not to mention Dexter Pittmans hatchet job. This team has basically had the red carpet unfurled for them by the league on their way to the finals.

NFL had bounties and sounds like the NBA does too.   Why he is not suspended after this admission is beyond me.

Re: some more unbelievable Miami stats
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2012, 01:12:16 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
This is the same team with Haslem admitting that dirty foul on Hanborough was retribution for Wade. Not to mention Dexter Pittmans hatchet job. This team has basically had the red carpet unfurled for them by the league on their way to the finals.

This is a hard enough series for the Celtics without referees influencing the game. But with their help forget it. We don't stand a chance. That stat by Tanguay needs to be sent to every GM in the league. At some point the rubber needs to hit the road.
Indiana had a GM saying they were S-O-F-T after plenty of hard fouls and Granger becoming a hockey goon. Not surprising they had techs called.

Also, I don't believe that flagrant fouls are technical fouls. How many of the T's were defensive 3 second violations, which are more likely to happen when you have to defend against 2 elite defenders (and you center is *very* immobile)?