Author Topic: Why weren't we in on Camby?  (Read 1923 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Why weren't we in on Camby?
« on: March 15, 2012, 04:21:18 PM »

Offline Potapenko Boxout

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 370
  • Tommy Points: 40
If Camby was had for two super first round busts with small contracts (J Flynn, Thabeet) , why the hell didn't we make an attempt to get him?

Re: Why weren't we in on Camby?
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2012, 04:23:37 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
If Camby was had for two super first round busts with small contracts (J Flynn, Thabeet) , why the hell didn't we make an attempt to get him?

Because the only things we had more attractive than Thabeet and Flynn are JJJ and E'twaun and Doc hasn't let either guy play enough to entice anyone into trading for them.  At least Flynn has proven he'll probably be a decent back-up.

Mike

Re: Why weren't we in on Camby?
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2012, 04:39:35 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Jonny Flynn is horrible.  Rockets fans are probably happy to be rid of him.  I will always think of this flow chart.

"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Why weren't we in on Camby?
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2012, 04:47:58 PM »

Offline huzy

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 241
  • Tommy Points: 82
  • We not Me
Jonny Flynn is horrible.  Rockets fans are probably happy to be rid of him.  I will always think of this flow chart.



Free Darko?
"      “I can make a trade every day if I want to, but that's not going to help us. A trade that would get us better rarely comes along. They're very difficult to find. Good trades are very difficult in our league and don't happen very often.”
-Danny Ainge

Re: Why weren't we in on Camby?
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2012, 04:53:45 PM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10331
  • Tommy Points: 465
I also wonder why the Celtics did get him? Or maybe they tried and the Blazers like Houston deal better. But wish he was here!
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Why weren't we in on Camby?
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2012, 04:54:29 PM »

Online snively

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6008
  • Tommy Points: 503
Thabeet is a more interesting prospect to Portland than anyone we would be willing to offer, IMHO. 
2025 Draft: Chicago Bulls

PG: Chauncey Billups/Deron Williams
SG: Kobe Bryant/Eric Gordon
SF: Jimmy Butler/Danny Granger/Danilo Gallinari
PF: Al Horford/Zion Williamson
C: Yao Ming/Pau Gasol/Tyson Chandler

Re: Why weren't we in on Camby?
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2012, 04:59:08 PM »

Offline CelticG1

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Tommy Points: 288
Im hoping somehow,  someway that danny has a strong idea of the Kaman situation and him landing here or another buyout.

Blazers aren't considering those guys,(thabeet and flynn )[/quote] as having any value imo. Aren't they just expirings?

Re: Why weren't we in on Camby?
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2012, 05:00:36 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
Thabeet is a more interesting prospect to Portland than anyone we would be willing to offer, IMHO. 

this is the same team that drafted Sam Bowie and Greg Oden, so yea, you're right