Author Topic: Artest v. Ariza  (Read 2231 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Artest v. Ariza
« on: June 14, 2010, 08:02:40 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
I think the Lakers should have kept Ariza.  Artest is horrible, especially on offense.  He's not that special on defense anymore either.  He's more of a bully than a good defensive player.  Ariza was a better fit.  He could hit the 3 and play good defense the right way.  Oh well, our gain. ;D

"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2010, 08:08:47 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
It seems teams were all gearing up to beat certain teams.


Orlando to beat LA
Cleveland to beat Orlando
LA to beat Lebron?


Nobody prepared to face the Celtics in the offseason. 



LA would be better with Ariza.  Good, quick defender with the ability to hit the outside shot. 

But with the way the Celtics defense is playing, I am sure he would have disappeared as well.  It takes an amazing player like Kobe to put up numbers every game against this defense.  Not even Gasol can do that.


(man, I am rambling this morning)

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2010, 08:18:31 AM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176
At this point, I'm not sure how much better Artest is than Tony Allen.  Well, at least Good Tony.  Pierce was having trouble early in the series, but PP also missed a lot of shots he will usually make.  Not sure Ron's making Pierce work any harder than TA's made Kobe work.

And on offense...  I love every jump shot Ron Artest takes.  Dude's HORRIBLE.

Plus, we now know that he's a flopper.  Funniest thing I've ever heard on a broadcast, after Rondo's little push and RonRon's Oscar-worthy fall, JVG screaming "Say Queensbridge NOW, Ron!"

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2010, 08:26:09 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
At this point, I'm not sure how much better Artest is than Tony Allen.  Well, at least Good Tony.  Pierce was having trouble early in the series, but PP also missed a lot of shots he will usually make.  Not sure Ron's making Pierce work any harder than TA's made Kobe work.

And on offense...  I love every jump shot Ron Artest takes.  Dude's HORRIBLE.

Plus, we now know that he's a flopper.  Funniest thing I've ever heard on a broadcast, after Rondo's little push and RonRon's Oscar-worthy fall, JVG screaming "Say Queensbridge NOW, Ron!"

Ariza is a much better offensive player than Tony and Artest.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2010, 08:27:45 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
LA would be better with Ariza.  Good, quick defender with the ability to hit the outside shot. 
That's the thing though, Ariza really isn't a better shooter than Artest and he showed that this year in Houston.

He's a better cutter and finisher at the rim though, and those aspects of his game would really benefit LA who are getting nothing from Artest offensively.

I don't know if he's a better defender than Artest though, all the stats and the first several playoff series tells me Ron Ron still has an edge in that department.

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2010, 08:28:22 AM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176
Oh, I'd absolutely take Ariza over either of them.  Dumb move by LA to make the de-facto Artest-for-Ariza swap this summer.  Said it at the time, still believe it.

Just shocking that Artest seems to have gotten so much worse on the offensive end, and now he's not quite the same defender.  Good, but not lockdown.

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2010, 08:29:00 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
At this point, I'm not sure how much better Artest is than Tony Allen.  Well, at least Good Tony.  Pierce was having trouble early in the series, but PP also missed a lot of shots he will usually make.  Not sure Ron's making Pierce work any harder than TA's made Kobe work.

And on offense...  I love every jump shot Ron Artest takes.  Dude's HORRIBLE.

Plus, we now know that he's a flopper.  Funniest thing I've ever heard on a broadcast, after Rondo's little push and RonRon's Oscar-worthy fall, JVG screaming "Say Queensbridge NOW, Ron!"

Ariza is a much better offensive player than Tony and Artest.
Yes, but only because he'll flash to the rim strongly. Most importantly he'll keep flashing even when his team mates don't find him, Artest won't do that.

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2010, 08:43:21 AM »

Offline Celtics17

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 874
  • Tommy Points: 108
Teams seem to do this all the time. They have a player who is a great 'fit' and they undervalue him. I kind of thought we did it with Posey too. It's really difficult to be a player who just happens to do exactly what your team needs the most, and in the case of Posey, do it at just the right time too. Those players are special, rarely need the limelight, and yet are so often undervalued.

Re: Artest v. Ariza
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2010, 08:44:55 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Teams seem to do this all the time. They have a player who is a great 'fit' and they undervalue him. I kind of thought we did it with Posey too. It's really difficult to be a player who just happens to do exactly what your team needs the most, and in the case of Posey, do it at just the right time too. Those players are special, rarely need the limelight, and yet are so often undervalued.
By all reports LA wanted Ariza for the same deal they ended up signing Artest to.

The problem was that Ariza felt like he should get more than the MLE from LA, despite no other team offering him more than the MLE.