Absolutely, I'd be very happy to have Mike Conley here.
I don't believe the initial report though. I can see Memphis trading Conley but for talent not cap flexibility. This is the same that has been willing to part with one of their first round draft picks for a rental of a good reserve player. Not a rebuilding team but a team that is looking to maximize their talent base for a run at the playoffs. Trading Conley for cap flexibility doesn't add up.
Possibly the Grizzlies are looking for cap room in order to solidify the resigning of Rudy Gay next summer.
Memphis only has $47 million on the payroll prior to re-signing Rudy Gay. They can easily afford him without making a salary dump and without getting anywhere close to the luxury tax threshold. It's not a factor.
I stand corrected.
Money is of course a factor, with every team, whether they're over the luxury tax or under the cap. Teams aren't making money. I'd say Memphis is toward the top of that list, even with their surprising success this year and relatively low payroll. THey don't have fans. You need to have fans to make money. The Lakers, Knicks, Celtics, teams like that, can pay twice as much in salary and make more of (or closer to) a profit because of their fan bases and ability to sell tickets and television rights. Memphis doesn't have that luxury. They have to keep things relatively cheap no matter what. So when there's a big increase in expenses next year via a Rudy Gay extension, they have to cut some costs, regardless of whether they're still under the cap.
And look, maybe they just figure they can get a player in the middle of this year's draft who contributes as much as Conley does, and that player will be far cheaper since he'll have a much lower salary slot than what Conley does at this stage in his career.
This is irrelevant to the Celtics as far as I can see, but I could easily understand Memphis cutting salary if a player's not performing up to what they're paying him, regardless of their overall salary level or the player's salary level.