Author Topic: My over/under thread.  (Read 1475 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

My over/under thread.
« on: September 29, 2009, 01:54:01 AM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
I'm going to list a bunch of stat-minded goals, then you decide whether actual numbers will fall short or exceed my numbers. (I assume that 99% of you know what over under means.)

1)Rasheed Wallace- 100 3PTs made (Sheed made 113 last year on 38MPG, BUT E.House hit 150 of them last year)

2)Glen Davis- 15 MPG

3)Marquis Daniels- 2 APG (Marquis has never avg'd over 2 assists in his career, but he's never been looked at in a permanant point role)

4)Rondo- 10 APG

5)Ray Allen- .470% FG%

Re: My over/under thread.
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2009, 06:33:22 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I'm going to say:

1) Under (Rasheed hits threes, but there's a lot more to his game that the team will utilize)

2) Over (it's basically a four man rotation, and Doc wants to limit KG's minutes)

3) Over (I think Daniels will be more of a distributor this year)

4) Under (I think Rondo will look for his own offense a bit more, maybe affecting his assist total.  I still see him just under 10, though.)

5) Over (I think we'll continue to see the ultra-efficient Ray, although he's only topped this number twice in his career.)

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: My over/under thread.
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2009, 08:06:55 AM »

Offline MattG12

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
1) Under
2)Over
3)Over
4)Under
5)Under

Almost agreed with Roy on everything.

Re: My over/under thread.
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2009, 02:20:43 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
1. Under
2. Over
3. Over
4. Under
5. Under
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: My over/under thread.
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2009, 09:03:49 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
I'm going to list a bunch of stat-minded goals, then you decide whether actual numbers will fall short or exceed my numbers. (I assume that 99% of you know what over under means.)

1)Rasheed Wallace- 100 3PTs made (Sheed made 113 last year on 38MPG, BUT E.House hit 150 of them last year)

2)Glen Davis- 15 MPG

3)Marquis Daniels- 2 APG (Marquis has never avg'd over 2 assists in his career, but he's never been looked at in a permanant point role)

4)Rondo- 10 APG

5)Ray Allen- .470% FG%

I'm going to say...

1. Under but i think Rasheed will hit 80+.
2. Over becuase of a 4 man big-rotation
3. Over becuase Marquis will be distributing on that second unit, But it's gonne be south of 3PG
4. I'm gonna go on a limb and say over, he has just been given to more effective offensive weapons for him to play with.
5. Over becuase with KG back, and Sheed here he will be even more selective with his shots.

Re: My over/under thread.
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2009, 03:22:57 AM »

Offline mzepol

  • Anfernee Simons
  • Posts: 308
  • Tommy Points: 56
I'm going to say:

1) Under (Rasheed hits threes, but there's a lot more to his game that the team will utilize)

2) Over (it's basically a four man rotation, and Doc wants to limit KG's minutes)

3) Over (I think Daniels will be more of a distributor this year)

4) Under (I think Rondo will look for his own offense a bit more, maybe affecting his assist total.  I still see him just under 10, though.)

5) Over (I think we'll continue to see the ultra-efficient Ray, although he's only topped this number twice in his career.)

I agree with this.