My brother was telling me, and it is pretty spot on, that historically, Dwight Howard has been pretty "human" against the C's, throughout regular season meetings etc.
Perk is really good at neutralizing what Howard wants to do or where Howard wants to go.
I don't necessarily agree that the Magic should be giving the ball to Howard down the stretch of the game for Howard to be dominant.
Should the Magic have given the ball more to Howard over the course of the game? Yes, because you want to get good shots.
But you don't force feed the post, just to force feed it. There has to be a sound strategy.
My brother also commented to me on how the Magic appear to play like a much better TEAM when Howard is on the bench (or suspended).
You can't really tell everything just by looking at the numbers/statistics, but in the Philly series, Howard was averaging 12 FGAs per game and averaged around 24-25 PPG.
In this series, Howard is averaging 11.7 FGAs per game and only scoring 16 PPG.
Now, I am well aware that FGA's doesn't equate to amount of "touches", but that has to do with the way the Celtics, namely Perk and Baby, are defending Howard.
We are doing a pretty darn good job of limiting Dwight's touches and also doing a fantastic job of not fouling Dwight and just playing him straight up.
I think there is this increasing philosophy leaning towards hacking Dwight whenever and whenever, but that is false gold, IMO. And I am glad we didn't fall trap into that. (Dwight's FTA in Philly Series = 57, against Celtics = 32)