Even though most Scali references are jokes, what happened to the Celtics when they went to Scali to replace KG?
So instead of banging on other posters and Scali, remember how good the team played when he started for KG.
It's easier to start Scal next to Perk than KG. Defensively you have Perk's muscle and overall heft in the paint. Offensively you have more room on the perimeter for Scal to float so spacing is better. Scal and KG together is workable (if KG lives in the post and shoulders all the interior defense) but not ideal. Scal and Perkins is a good match.
Someone like Glen Davis would give Kevin more freedom to play help defense and for Kevin to move to whatever offensive spots he wants to take up.
I agree with Who, Scal and KG doesn´t seem to be the right combination.
Start BBD, and when he´s in foul trouble(note: I said when, not if^^), you can still bring Posey, Brown or Powe.
Powe and KG is not a good combination, imo.
Brown is too valuable at the end of quarters, and with 38 years, I´m not sure if he can play big minutes.
Posey is too valuable off the bench, imo, as a wing or PF replacement. Additionally, I´m not convinced that we can play a full game of small ball.
Like Scal, Big Baby has proven to be helpful when KG went down (the spurs game, anyone?). We could keep our rebounding advantage and would still have the same bench options.