I usually make this post after 20 games, but this year the season is shorter so 1/4 of the season is 18 games. Due to postponements the Celts have only played 17 games, but I figure that after the 18th game (against the Lakers this weekend), nobody will want to talk about anything but whatever the narrative is following that game.
A reminder about the Four Factors
https://www.basketball-reference.com/about/factors.htmlBasically it's a way of thinking of the key things a team has to do at both ends to win games. Shoot the ball, maximize possessions, rebound the ball, and generate easy attempts (e.g. free throws) while limiting easy attempts for the opponent.
I find this to be a helpful way to re-orient my impressions of the team by challenging my eye-test instinct against which things the stats say the team is doing well and not so well.
This is how the Celtics are doing in these categories so far this year:
ORtg - 109.9 (8th)
DRtg - 107.9 (16th)
Pace - 16thTurnoversTO / possession - 14.6% (23rd)
Opponent TO/possession - 15.1% (6th)
ReboundingOff. Reb% - 25.3% (5th)
Def. Reb% - 77.8% (14th)
ShootingEFG% - 54.2% (10th)
Opponent EFG% - 53.7% (17th)
3-point Rate - 36.2% (22nd)
Opponent 3-point Rate - 37.3% (9th)
Fastbreak PPG - 13.8 (15th)
Opponent Fastbreak PPG - 14.2 (25th)
Paint PPG - 46.8 (12th)
Opponent Paint PPG - 47.3 (18th)
Free ThrowsFTA per FGA - 0.235 (23rd)
Oppenent FTA per FGA - 0.277 (24th)
SummaryThe Celtics are a very good, not great offensive team. They are an average-ish defensive team.
The Celtics play at an average pace.
They are very good at forcing turnovers. They pressure the opponent on the offensive glass.
The Celtics are a decent defensive rebounding team. They're a pretty good shooting team overall, and their opponents are hitting an average percentage of their shots. The Celts are pretty good at limiting opponents' three point attempts, and allow their opponents an average amount of points inside. For their own part, the Celtics score a decent amount inside.
The Celtics are giving up too many turnovers, which undermines the advantage they get from forcing turnovers. Because they give up so many turnovers, the opponent is getting a lot of fast break points. They don't generate very many free throws (a long-running trend for this team), and they allow too many opponent free throws (also a long running trend).
OutlookObviously a key caveat to all of this is that the Celts haven't had their main team together for hardly any minutes so far this season. I think there's reason to think that they will trend toward being an elite offense (top 3-5) while moving toward top 10-12 on defense.
However, it is troubling that the free throw rate remains such an issue despite Tatum and Brown both emerging as very good volume scoring options.
Getting Pritchard back and Kemba continuing to work back into form should help limit turnovers, which will in turn improve the defensive numbers. I'm not as optimistic that we can expect a lot of improvement with respect to free throws, since the Celtics have almost always been bad at generating free throws except for the one season that IT was averaging nearly 30 points a game.
Is elite offense and a borderline top 10 defense good enough to go far in the post-season? Hard to say. Last year the Celtics were top 5 on both ends. The good news is that there aren't any teams in the East that are elite on both ends.
So far this season, only the Lakers and Jazz are top 5 on offense and defense. However, the Bucks are the top offense and 10th on defense, and may improve defensively as the season goes along. The Sixers are 12th on offense and 5th on defense. That seems about right for them. Brooklyn is 3rd on offense but tied for 20th on defense.
It's hard to take Brooklyn seriously as a contender as long as their defense is that bad. Then again, LeBron carried some putrid defensive teams to the Finals, so maybe Durant and Harden can do the same.