0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: greg683x on May 29, 2019, 08:20:35 AMQuote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 08:13:32 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 29, 2019, 07:47:14 AMQuote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 06:24:45 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 28, 2019, 12:43:37 PMNobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwiseThere are a number of teams that would deal for gordon right now, that wouldnt cost picks to move him.Moving him for free capspace would be difficult, but also moronic imo.Detroit and charlotte are 2 teams off the top of my head that would trade for him.Indy, miami, portland, sas could all be in that grouping as well.Let me rephrase then. We’re not gonna be able to trade Hayward without receiving a negative return or swapping him with another bad contract, in which case I’d rather just hold onto HaywardI still disagree.Hayward still has alot of value around the league, injury and bad season aside, most people understand that he is a bad fit on this team as currently constructed as most of the wings had a less than stellar season.BrownTatumHaywardRozierall performed worse this past season than seasons prior. Now if Hayward had another season performing poorly on a team with fewer wings needing the ball, then you would be on to something.Believing he’ll return to form, and putting your job on the line for that belief are two different things. You’re talking about a GM that would be taking ALL the risk in a deal since you’re saying we could land a positive return.No GM is gonna put their neck on the line and give us a positive return for Gordon given the amount of money owed and what they’d be losing in the process. I don’t care if they believe he’ll probably return to form. There’s other less risky options around the league.A positive return on this team could well be a negative asset on another.It is possible for both teams to win a deal.
Quote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 08:13:32 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 29, 2019, 07:47:14 AMQuote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 06:24:45 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 28, 2019, 12:43:37 PMNobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwiseThere are a number of teams that would deal for gordon right now, that wouldnt cost picks to move him.Moving him for free capspace would be difficult, but also moronic imo.Detroit and charlotte are 2 teams off the top of my head that would trade for him.Indy, miami, portland, sas could all be in that grouping as well.Let me rephrase then. We’re not gonna be able to trade Hayward without receiving a negative return or swapping him with another bad contract, in which case I’d rather just hold onto HaywardI still disagree.Hayward still has alot of value around the league, injury and bad season aside, most people understand that he is a bad fit on this team as currently constructed as most of the wings had a less than stellar season.BrownTatumHaywardRozierall performed worse this past season than seasons prior. Now if Hayward had another season performing poorly on a team with fewer wings needing the ball, then you would be on to something.Believing he’ll return to form, and putting your job on the line for that belief are two different things. You’re talking about a GM that would be taking ALL the risk in a deal since you’re saying we could land a positive return.No GM is gonna put their neck on the line and give us a positive return for Gordon given the amount of money owed and what they’d be losing in the process. I don’t care if they believe he’ll probably return to form. There’s other less risky options around the league.
Quote from: greg683x on May 29, 2019, 07:47:14 AMQuote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 06:24:45 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 28, 2019, 12:43:37 PMNobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwiseThere are a number of teams that would deal for gordon right now, that wouldnt cost picks to move him.Moving him for free capspace would be difficult, but also moronic imo.Detroit and charlotte are 2 teams off the top of my head that would trade for him.Indy, miami, portland, sas could all be in that grouping as well.Let me rephrase then. We’re not gonna be able to trade Hayward without receiving a negative return or swapping him with another bad contract, in which case I’d rather just hold onto HaywardI still disagree.Hayward still has alot of value around the league, injury and bad season aside, most people understand that he is a bad fit on this team as currently constructed as most of the wings had a less than stellar season.BrownTatumHaywardRozierall performed worse this past season than seasons prior. Now if Hayward had another season performing poorly on a team with fewer wings needing the ball, then you would be on to something.
Quote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 06:24:45 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 28, 2019, 12:43:37 PMNobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwiseThere are a number of teams that would deal for gordon right now, that wouldnt cost picks to move him.Moving him for free capspace would be difficult, but also moronic imo.Detroit and charlotte are 2 teams off the top of my head that would trade for him.Indy, miami, portland, sas could all be in that grouping as well.Let me rephrase then. We’re not gonna be able to trade Hayward without receiving a negative return or swapping him with another bad contract, in which case I’d rather just hold onto Hayward
Quote from: greg683x on May 28, 2019, 12:43:37 PMNobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwiseThere are a number of teams that would deal for gordon right now, that wouldnt cost picks to move him.Moving him for free capspace would be difficult, but also moronic imo.Detroit and charlotte are 2 teams off the top of my head that would trade for him.Indy, miami, portland, sas could all be in that grouping as well.
Nobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwise
The only way you get Durant (and it’s not particularly realistic):1. Durant opts into his contract, in a prearranged agreement to be traded to Boston.2. Horford opts into his contract, in a prearranged agreement to be traded to Golden State.3. Boston trades Horford and Brown and/or picks to GS for Durant.4. Kyrie re-signs.5. Celts trade Tatum + Smart + remaining assets for AD.DavisMorrisDurantHaywardKyrie
Quote from: TheSundanceKid on May 29, 2019, 06:46:51 AMQuote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 06:24:45 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 28, 2019, 12:43:37 PMNobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwiseThere are a number of teams that would deal for gordon right now, that wouldnt cost picks to move him.Moving him for free capspace would be difficult, but also moronic imo.Detroit and charlotte are 2 teams off the top of my head that would trade for him.Indy, miami, portland, sas could all be in that grouping as well.But who are you trading for that gives more upside than Hayward? We don't need extra depth, we already struggle to appease those on the team. We need a move that consolidates assets on the team into a better player. Moving Hayward only works if it's part of a package for Durant, otherwise you're better moving other assets and continuing with Hayward's recoveryI move Hayward for 1 of 2 thingsA proper center that allows at the worst, for Horford to move to the PF spot(ideally off the bench for 30 minutes a game)orSmaller, closer to expiring deals that can be used as ballast in a deal for Davis
Quote from: Silky on May 29, 2019, 06:24:45 AMQuote from: greg683x on May 28, 2019, 12:43:37 PMNobody is taking Haywards contract right now, you’re living in a fantasy world if you think otherwiseThere are a number of teams that would deal for gordon right now, that wouldnt cost picks to move him.Moving him for free capspace would be difficult, but also moronic imo.Detroit and charlotte are 2 teams off the top of my head that would trade for him.Indy, miami, portland, sas could all be in that grouping as well.But who are you trading for that gives more upside than Hayward? We don't need extra depth, we already struggle to appease those on the team. We need a move that consolidates assets on the team into a better player. Moving Hayward only works if it's part of a package for Durant, otherwise you're better moving other assets and continuing with Hayward's recovery