Sure, 50% on threes is "unsustainable," but so was below 20%.
He's most likely to settle in as an average to slightly above average three point shooter.
Sure, he shot 30% from three last season, and he'll probably shoot around 30% this season. There's a long way to go from that to average.
I was watching the game on and off yesterday, but it seems every time I sat down the front of the TV, Marcus was either lollygagging bringing the ball up the floor, making a bad decision offensively, or getting killed on the other end of the floor. I was surprised he had 17 points when it was all said and done, but it looks like that was just the product of hitting a handful of threes.
He didn't shoot 30% last season; he shot 33%. There's a significant difference. Considering his awful start shooting the ball from deep this season, I don't expect him to get back to that number. If he can get to 30 by the end of 2015-16, I'll consider that a success.
With more reps and more confidence, I still think he'll be better than that moving forward. His stroke looks good.
Time will tell.
Fair enough. He was at 30% for his career before the hot streak, that's what I remember.
I don't know about his stroke. It looks "good" to me in the same way in which Tim Tebow's throwing motion looks good in slo-mo, if I can use a football analogy.
Smart kind of winds up, brings the ball down, and has an awfully slow release. He also took some horrible heat check threes during that game when he shot 5 for 9 which probably won't fall on most days. He may still end up a decent offensive player, but the idea that he'll average 17ppg is wildly premature at this point.