1 championship or multiple?

[GreenWarrior]

just trying get a feel of what everyone would do?

[D.o.s.]

First vote, voted for the second option. I care more about watching the Celtics play great basketball than whether or not they win a title.

[manl_lui]

in terms of percentage - 1 championship now = 100%

chance at multiple championships but not guaranteed could mean at least 2 chips but could also mean 0 chips.

I'm going with 1 championship NOW

[wdleehi]

You take the 1 title.



Then let the players, coaches and GMs do their job and work to win more. 

[Birdman]

I take a championship now..thats what the players plays for (and money lol) and that's what us, the fans, want..history will remember the titles, not the runner ups

[Roy H.]

[chambers]

Here's a good question that will make you really think about the original question.....

Would you give up the 2008 championship if it meant that KG didn't injure his knee in 2009?

I think if KG stays healthy we win 2009 and 2010. We are probably a good shot vs the Heat in 2011 (but Rondo goes down) and we are better against the Heat in 2012.

I chose multiple shots, assuming that if we win one, we only win one. Period....With no chance to win any others.

[GreenWarrior]

Here's a good question that will make you really think about the original question.....

Would you give up the 2008 championship if it meant that KG didn't injure his knee in 2009?

I think if KG stays healthy we win 2009 and 2010. We are probably a good shot vs the Heat in 2011 (but Rondo goes down) and we are better against the Heat in 2012.

I chose multiple shots, assuming that if we win one, we only win one. Period....With no chance to win any others.

I like that scenario. and I actually agree if KG were healthy we win more rings. but I would not trade that 1 for only a chance at more.