I'm saying no for the same reason most people are. Four 1st round picks is just too rich for a guy who could (and maybe should) pull a Dwight Howard and go play wherever he wants in 1 year.
I'd give up two 1st rounders and a young player. I think #6 this year is a given and probably our pick next year. They can pick Sully or KO and I'll take back Martin's deal if they want to swap him for Anthony's expiring.
This with #6 and our 2015 1st going to them:
With Martin:
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=nja2gzqWithout:
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=k78oyyfI'd probably bargain with the 2015 Clipper pick too if that is what it takes. But 3 is my limit for a possible rental. It's worth it to me to compete while the East is weak (maybe weaker next year) and also to give Rondo a good reason to stick around in 2015.
Not sure they can get a deal that gives them:
-expiring deals
-three 1st rounders
-a young talented player
-offloading Martin's contract
The only other team that could give them as much is probably Utah. Maybe the Sixers. The idea that Faried and #11 is better than #6 and KO isn't completely laughable but Faried+11 isn't better than KO+6+two-more-1sts+cap-room. That is just common sense I think.
GS has to send back a bad contract to get Love, almost certainly David Lee. They also have no picks, only young (and certainly talented) players. I might deal Love for Thompson/Barnes if I didn't have to take back Lee.
So call me crazy but I might stop at #6, KO, expirings and our 2015 1st. I think that is a reasonable offer and I doubt another team beats it. Four 1st round picks is just insanity to me. I'm loathe to give up 3.