Author Topic: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers  (Read 2325 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« on: December 27, 2013, 09:59:43 AM »

Online KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8703
  • Tommy Points: 1142

 Player A MPG 20.0  PPG 6.6  RPG 4.7 Assists 1.6

 Player B MPG 19.8  PPG 6.0  RPG 5.9 Assists .8

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2013, 10:13:27 AM »

Online KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8703
  • Tommy Points: 1142
Interestingly enough Player A is Kelly O. And player B is Sullinger in his first year. The huge difference is fg% where Sully just crushes him. Olynyk has taken more shots a game 5.0 to 6.5. And Sully shot around 75% from the line while Olynyk is at an eye popping 96%.

 Not even saying KO will become half the player of my boy Sully. But it's worth noting that he still could get much better.

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2013, 10:31:26 AM »

Offline LatterDayCelticsfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2265
  • Tommy Points: 176
  • Ruto Must Go!
Are these numbers per 36 or per 48?
Ruto Must Go!

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2013, 11:03:33 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Here;s the difference. When Sully got hurt his numbers were on the rise and he probably would have ended up with numbers similar to his current career stats now if he didn't get hurt.

Since a fast start, KO's numbers are falling.

So right now, comparing their first season stats makes it appear they were similar players with similar success in their first seasons. When taken into context, its pretty easy to see that Sully was a progressing rookie with bigger things expected(which happened this year even though he was returning from an injury) while Olynyk is a rookie that stared with some decent games to start the year but has regressed as the year has gone on.

I would like to see what both players stats are after both have played 82 games.

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2013, 11:51:11 AM »

Offline Sketch5

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3249
  • Tommy Points: 281
KO's biggest problem this year has been fouls. He gets called for some cheap ones, and he has to sit and never get in any good rhythm. The other is he looks to other people and not for his own shot. You know if KG was here he'd be in KO's ear about that, like he was with AB and Sully.

I think thats the biggest lost from the Nets trade is KG's leadership and teaching's of the bigs.

Some times KO doesn't realize who's on him, and were he can get his shot off. Sully still has that issue at times. Sulyy needs to learn the scoop underneath the defenders arm shot, and try not to go over someone like Drummond who's just going to send it back 8 times out of 10.

I think when Rondo comes back, they will work the pick and pop that Rondo and Bass did a couple years ago that made Bass look like a borderline all star.

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2013, 11:53:08 AM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 35011
  • Tommy Points: 1614
Player A - 42.2% (2), 23.1% (3) (26 shots already), 95.7% (FT) - Born April 19, 1991
Player B - 50.5% (2), 20.0% (3) (5 shots total), 74.6% (FT) - Born March 4, 1992
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2013, 12:31:13 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
What happened to KO is that Sully got in shape and took his playing time while he was injured. I expect things to pick up for him on e we move Bass.

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2013, 12:36:10 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
What happened to KO is that Sully got in shape and took his playing time while he was injured. I expect things to pick up for him on e we move Bass.
And if we don't move Bass?

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2013, 12:38:24 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
What happened to KO is that Sully got in shape and took his playing time while he was injured. I expect things to pick up for him on e we move Bass.
And if we don't move Bass?

I shudder when thinking of that possibility!

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2013, 12:40:56 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
What happened to KO is that Sully got in shape and took his playing time while he was injured. I expect things to pick up for him on e we move Bass.
And if we don't move Bass?

I shudder when thinking of that possibility!

Ainge has said multiple times that this year is not about making the playoffs, it's about development. I'm sure we will move Bass as he is not going to be our PF of the future, and open up more minutes for KO, Sully, and even Vitor.

Re: Guess these Celtics players first year numbers
« Reply #10 on: December 27, 2013, 12:53:00 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
Here's another comparison that does a better job of equalizing shooting percentages, height and weight:

Player A: 7'0" 238 lb., MPG 20.0  PPG 6.6  RPG 4.7 Assists 1.6 2pt% .422 3pt% .231

Player B: 7'0", 238 lb., MPG 25.0 PPG 8.6 RPG 5.2 AST 0.8 2pt% .427 3pt% .286