Author Topic: Sullinger Shooting 3's  (Read 7272 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2013, 02:44:57 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19707
  • Tommy Points: 1625
As long as Sully is taking the shots within the flow of the offense and he is open, I don't have a problem with it.  Last year he seemed to have a good shooting touch.  It would be great for Sully and KO to at least be a threat from 3 point line.  It will open up a lot of space for the rest of the offense.

I don't think Sully has the same mentality as the guy who said "because there aren't any 4's".  So I am not worried about him becoming AW.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2013, 02:48:09 PM »

Offline 2short

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6080
  • Tommy Points: 428
If he and KO can show 30% shooting three pointers AS TRAILERS I'm okay with it.  Sort of like McHale used to do, I'd rather neither big is out that far unless its to set a screen.
I'm for ball movement and cutting for wings and bigs down low or as far as sully & ko love them on high post as passers.  Both guys (ko especially) show nice passing skills.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2013, 05:02:17 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20278
  • Tommy Points: 1342
Which what was released in the paper it will be a shooting range from 3P tonight.   I think we have 5-6 guys who can shoot it ok,  1-2 who can shoot it well, no one can shoot it good and the rest of the roster makes me cringe when they shoot it.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2013, 05:17:04 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
If he is on the floor with another big who wants to work down low, he will find himself on the perimeter at times, sometimes behind the 3pt line. When setting pick, he might also hind himself there.

It is preseason. This is the time to try things out. These games don't count. At all.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2013, 06:24:07 PM »

Offline Steve from Milford

  • Hugo Gonzalez
  • Posts: 50
  • Tommy Points: 6
I really bought in to the statements that the Celtics are not tanking. Of course I didn't include Danny in that as most teams that tank do it from the top by how they structure the roster not by the coach or players (not counting M.L. Carr of course).

However, I now believe that Brad Stevens is tanking. His instructions for all of the bigs hoist up a 3 whenever they are open, is clearly designed to lose games. Calling it a "strategy" is plain nonsense.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2013, 08:41:18 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
but i would think Sully's biggest value to the team is to be where the true high % shots are - from right next to the hoop.
I'm not optimistic about his ability to be a reliable finisher around the basket. He's surely crafty, but he doesn't have any particular size, length, or lift to write home about.

For what it's worth, he shot .300 from 3-10 feet, and .667 from within 3 feet (both were drawn from nontrivial sample sizes). Which to me means that unless he's getting an open layup or a dunk, he's not very good in getting close shots off.

  Different websites have slightly different numbers, but from hoopdata that .667 would be slightly above average for rotation-level power forwards. Also, you'll find that it's fairly common to see largish fluctuations in those 3-10 foot jumpers for many players. It's probably not a *tiny* sample size, but if he took 1 such shot a game then 1 more made shot a month would have pushed him close to 40% on those 3-10 footers.
The sample size is 40+ 3-9 ft shots total, it's not a lot but enough to draw some inference.

But yes, fair enough, the data shows two things: (1) inside shots may be Sullinger's best weapon, relative to other shots (though I don't think there's enough data for conclusive evidence on long jumpers), and (2) when he comes to inside shots, he's pretty much average.

I'll stipulate that his % assisted for close shots is lower than the average, so he works for some of these. Yet, I can't see a player who was on par with the league average as a credible long-term threat.

  I'd say that part of the reason for the low assist % is that he's a good offensive rebounder. In any case, it's fairly typical for a young player's inside fg% to go up by a decent amount after a few years, so his being on par with the league average in the first half of his rookie season is pretty encouraging.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2013, 08:52:40 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7484
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
He's obviously been given the green light by his coach. They're trying to make him the ultimate stretch four aka a rich man's Carlos Boozer. Good idea.
if he can drag his defender out of the paint it will create mismatches.
Same goes for Olynyk.
We are a horrid 3 point shooting team overall. Probably the worst in the league?
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2013, 09:00:26 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37961
  • Tommy Points: 3044
This is a development season,  about sorting out the team and seeing who is be staying with what skills.


Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2013, 09:18:56 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
My dream roster is Rondo plus 3-4 guys on the floor who can shoot threes, with a top five defense.  Think of it as an inverted form of the SVG-D12 Orlando team.

If the math says Sullinger should take a three then, by God, I want him to take that three.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2013, 09:45:23 PM »

Offline lightspeed5

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Tommy Points: 283
danny told him to do this. we're trying to get wiggins.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2013, 11:37:13 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
I don't think we have anyone as talented as Antoine (re: scoring) in our big rotation.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Sullinger Shooting 3's
« Reply #26 on: October 12, 2013, 08:55:54 AM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
If he and KO can show 30% shooting three pointers AS TRAILERS I'm okay with it.  Sort of like McHale used to do, I'd rather neither big is out that far unless its to set a screen.
I'm for ball movement and cutting for wings and bigs down low or as far as sully & ko love them on high post as passers.  Both guys (ko especially) show nice passing skills.

Ugh. That sounds like a bad idea to me, but other teams would like it. There's no opportunity for a bad 3-point shooter to shoot even a corner 3 as a trailer.