Author Topic: log jam at the 2 position  (Read 4941 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2013, 07:21:05 PM »

Offline timobusa

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3415
  • Tommy Points: 284
  • Bleed Green, Die Green
I can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.

Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooks

thats not bad at the 2 spot.


Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2013, 08:13:03 PM »

Offline Yogi

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1606
  • Tommy Points: 255
I can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.

Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooks

thats not bad at the 2 spot.

Why does Brooks have more upside?  They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive. 
CelticsBlog DKC Pelicans
J. Lin/I. Canaan/N. Wolters
E. Gordon/A. Shved
N. Batum/A. Roberson
A. Davis/K. Olynyk/M. Scott
D. Cousins/A. Baynes/V. Faverani
Rights: A. Abrines, R. Neto, L. Jean-Charles  Coach: M. Williams

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #17 on: July 15, 2013, 08:47:15 PM »

Offline celtic -_- pride

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 678
  • Tommy Points: 60
  • Stuff & Things
I can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.

Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooks

thats not bad at the 2 spot.

Why does Brooks have more upside?  They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive.
because crawford is a poophead. you know what i mean. i think brooks wants to strive to be great (whether his talents will allow him) and i think crawford thinks he's great (when he is most certainly not). brooks > crawford and that's all day
[img width= height=]http://s7.postimg.org/jsyw5qrez/banner.jpg[/img]

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #18 on: July 15, 2013, 08:49:00 PM »

Offline lightspeed5

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Tommy Points: 283
crawford's weed socks scream champion.



I always wonder what red auerbach would have done if he saw crawford wearing these socks.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #19 on: July 15, 2013, 08:55:36 PM »

Offline Vox_Populi

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4468
  • Tommy Points: 346
I might want to keep Brooks. At least he can create some offensive for himself and isn't prone to moments of madness.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #20 on: July 15, 2013, 08:56:50 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10766
  • Tommy Points: 1196
crawford's weed socks scream champion.



I always wonder what red auerbach would have done if he saw crawford wearing these socks.
bet he tried it beore ;)

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #21 on: July 15, 2013, 08:57:49 PM »

Offline lightspeed5

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Tommy Points: 283
im cool with crawford because he got into carmelos head. its the KG effect.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #22 on: July 15, 2013, 09:11:44 PM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
We have a logjam at nearly every position right now.

It's like one big logjam made out of really crappy logs no one else wanted and dumped on us, and we have to pay some of the logs tens of millions of dollars.

lol

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2013, 09:16:32 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20325
  • Tommy Points: 1348
Just have try outs in camp and keep the best.   Let the cream rise to the crop.  Keep who is best.   You have Bradley who isn't a 2 or 1 neither a SG or PG but defensive specialist.   Lee is the best one of the 2 guards by a long shot.   Crawford and Brooks are both inefficient scorers.   Both have a lot of moxie and think they are way better than what they are.  Brooks is the cheaper of the two.

I bet Crawford or Brooks is moved with Bass somewhere.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #24 on: July 16, 2013, 12:31:13 AM »

Offline itsthatbradguy

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 31
  • Tommy Points: 0
Keep Bradley as the starter, Lee & Brooks as back ups, Bogans as a veteran presence for them.

While Brooks' main shortcoming is defense, he has 3 very very solid players around him that can help him out a lot.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #25 on: July 16, 2013, 12:34:15 AM »

Offline timobusa

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3415
  • Tommy Points: 284
  • Bleed Green, Die Green
I can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.

Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooks

thats not bad at the 2 spot.

Why does Brooks have more upside?  They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive.
because crawford is a poophead. you know what i mean. i think brooks wants to strive to be great (whether his talents will allow him) and i think crawford thinks he's great (when he is most certainly not). brooks > crawford and that's all day

This guy nailed it in the head,,, PoopHead.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #26 on: July 16, 2013, 01:02:00 AM »

Offline celtic -_- pride

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 678
  • Tommy Points: 60
  • Stuff & Things
I can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.

Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooks

thats not bad at the 2 spot.

Why does Brooks have more upside?  They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive.
because crawford is a poophead. you know what i mean. i think brooks wants to strive to be great (whether his talents will allow him) and i think crawford thinks he's great (when he is most certainly not). brooks > crawford and that's all day

This guy nailed it in the head,,, PoopHead.
seeing how we cant curse i thought that was my best effort at calling him what i wanted. crawford just seems like that scummy dude thats full of himself but has already peaked. he has the potential but not the brains/maturity to keep progressing. can you tell i'm not a fan ?
[img width= height=]http://s7.postimg.org/jsyw5qrez/banner.jpg[/img]

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #27 on: July 16, 2013, 01:29:25 AM »

Offline timobusa

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3415
  • Tommy Points: 284
  • Bleed Green, Die Green
I can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.

Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooks

thats not bad at the 2 spot.

Why does Brooks have more upside?  They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive.
because crawford is a poophead. you know what i mean. i think brooks wants to strive to be great (whether his talents will allow him) and i think crawford thinks he's great (when he is most certainly not). brooks > crawford and that's all day

This guy nailed it in the head,,, PoopHead.
seeing how we cant curse i thought that was my best effort at calling him what i wanted. crawford just seems like that scummy dude thats full of himself but has already peaked. he has the potential but not the brains/maturity to keep progressing. can you tell i'm not a fan ?

I actually like Crawford, but I think I'm gonna like Marshon Brooks better than him. He seems like he is level headed compared to Jordan Crawford who seems out of it 99% of the time.
They play the same position, similar built, both known as scorers. So dropping Crawford is not really a big deal.

Re: log jam at the 2 position
« Reply #28 on: July 16, 2013, 02:44:00 AM »

Offline merkins

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 211
  • Tommy Points: 15
crawford's weed socks scream champion.



I always wonder what red auerbach would have done if he saw crawford wearing these socks.

Parish would have asked him for a lighter.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2013, 05:15:11 AM by merkins »