0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooksthats not bad at the 2 spot.
Quote from: timobusa on July 15, 2013, 07:21:05 PMI can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooksthats not bad at the 2 spot.Why does Brooks have more upside? They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive.
crawford's weed socks scream champion.I always wonder what red auerbach would have done if he saw crawford wearing these socks.
We have a logjam at nearly every position right now.It's like one big logjam made out of really crappy logs no one else wanted and dumped on us, and we have to pay some of the logs tens of millions of dollars.
Quote from: Yogi on July 15, 2013, 08:13:03 PMQuote from: timobusa on July 15, 2013, 07:21:05 PMI can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooksthats not bad at the 2 spot.Why does Brooks have more upside? They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive. because crawford is a poophead. you know what i mean. i think brooks wants to strive to be great (whether his talents will allow him) and i think crawford thinks he's great (when he is most certainly not). brooks > crawford and that's all day
Quote from: celtic -_- pride on July 15, 2013, 08:47:15 PMQuote from: Yogi on July 15, 2013, 08:13:03 PMQuote from: timobusa on July 15, 2013, 07:21:05 PMI can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooksthats not bad at the 2 spot.Why does Brooks have more upside? They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive. because crawford is a poophead. you know what i mean. i think brooks wants to strive to be great (whether his talents will allow him) and i think crawford thinks he's great (when he is most certainly not). brooks > crawford and that's all dayThis guy nailed it in the head,,, PoopHead.
Quote from: timobusa on July 16, 2013, 12:34:15 AMQuote from: celtic -_- pride on July 15, 2013, 08:47:15 PMQuote from: Yogi on July 15, 2013, 08:13:03 PMQuote from: timobusa on July 15, 2013, 07:21:05 PMI can live with Crawford being cut or traded, doesnt matter to me, I think Marshon has more upside.Keep the pitbulls though. Bradley/Lee/Brooksthats not bad at the 2 spot.Why does Brooks have more upside? They are almost the same age and Crawford has been more productive. because crawford is a poophead. you know what i mean. i think brooks wants to strive to be great (whether his talents will allow him) and i think crawford thinks he's great (when he is most certainly not). brooks > crawford and that's all dayThis guy nailed it in the head,,, PoopHead.seeing how we cant curse i thought that was my best effort at calling him what i wanted. crawford just seems like that scummy dude thats full of himself but has already peaked. he has the potential but not the brains/maturity to keep progressing. can you tell i'm not a fan ?