To follow up on my last post, which of these two teams from the 63-64 season do you think is better?
Boston Celtics without Bill
John Havlicek - HOF
Sam Jones - HOF
Tommy Heinsohn - HOF
KC Jones - HOF
Frank Ramsey - HOF
Clyde Lovellette - HOF
Tom Sanders - HOF as contributor
Willie Naulls
Jim Loscutoff
Larry Siegried (rookie)
Johnny McCarthy
or
San Francisco Warriors without Wilt
Nate Thurmond (rookie) - HOF
Al Attles
Tom Meschery
Wayne Hightower
Guy Rodgers
Gary Phillips
Gary Hill (rookie)
George Lee
Kenny Sears
John Windsor (rookie)
You can pretty much do this with any of Bill's Celtics' teams and any of Wilt's teams and get the same result until that Sixers team in 66-67 and then it was still just Wilt, Greer, Cunningham, and Chet Walker who was just elected to the HOF last year. That was also the year Bill shaved his HOF teammates down to just Hondo, S. Jones, and Bailey Howell of course Boston also had Don Nelson (HOF coach), Tom Sanders (HOF contributor), and Wayne Embry (HOF contributor).
So when Bill and Wilt were both in their primes and both had the same amount of HOF teammates, Wilt's team destroyed Bill's. That has always been my point. Bill was blessed to have been on a team loaded with HOFers, while Wilt wasn't for much of his career. Had Wilt been drafted to Boston and Bill been drafted to Philly, I have no doubt that Wilt would be the one with all of the titles and would be without question the greatest player that will EVER play the game. The only reason it is in doubt is the titles, which Wilt couldn't do a darn thing about because his teammates just weren't very good.