Author Topic: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO  (Read 1867 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« on: April 05, 2012, 04:31:05 PM »

Offline CbrewEra

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 421
  • Tommy Points: 37
  • LETS GO BOSTON
Serious question here.  Why did he not amnesty this guy.  Did he honestly believe that JO could play an entire season? 
There was clearly better options out there at the 6 mill we gave him. 
If not better, at least guys who have proved they can hold up for an entire season, and rebound the ball.
"He trades like a drunk Texas oilman trying to impress a beautiful woman"

Re: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2012, 04:32:24 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
We used the mini-mle on Wilcox we had no other exceptions to sign a player, amnestying O'Neal would not have allowed us to sign another player. It would have just saved the team some luxury tax money.

Re: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2012, 04:32:56 PM »

Offline RajonRondo9Dime

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 231
  • Tommy Points: 9
You do realize we were so far over the cap, amnestying JO would have done nothing, right? 

Re: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2012, 04:33:50 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Serious question here.  Why did he not amnesty this guy.  Did he honestly believe that JO could play an entire season? 
There was clearly better options out there at the 6 mill we gave him. 
If not better, at least guys who have proved they can hold up for an entire season, and rebound the ball.

they would only have been able to replace him with a min cotract because they are over the salary cap. Danny probably thought that JO was a better option than any big man vet min player. Plus they would have had to eat the rest of his contract anyways.

Re: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2012, 05:37:16 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Serious question here.  Why did he not amnesty this guy.  Did he honestly believe that JO could play an entire season? 
There was clearly better options out there at the 6 mill we gave him. 
If not better, at least guys who have proved they can hold up for an entire season, and rebound the ball.

they would only have been able to replace him with a min cotract because they are over the salary cap. Danny probably thought that JO was a better option than any big man vet min player. Plus they would have had to eat the rest of his contract anyways.

Exactly. If your still going to be paying him anyways why not actually try to get minutes out of him?

Re: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2012, 05:51:06 PM »

Offline Kane3387

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8269
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Intensity!!!
For all the reasons you see above and the fact that JO barely played last season but played well in the playoffs. We were hoping that he would at least be another big man with 6 fouls.


KG: "Dude.... What is up with yo shorts?!"

CBD_2016 Cavs Remaining Picks - 14.14

Re: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2012, 06:25:32 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20121
  • Tommy Points: 1333
I think GM's who amnesty will get bad reps with the guys perhaps.

Re: Why Danny didn't Amnesty JO
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2012, 06:30:20 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
I think GM's who amnesty will get bad reps with the guys perhaps.

Maybe, but the correct answer to the question is because Ainge understands how the salary cap works and isn't a moron, like some GMs.  (I'm looking at you, Golden State.  Worst use of the amnesty clause ever.)
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference