I think all trades should receive league approval if 2/3 say no it's vetoed

[rastafarian]

Make this kind of like fantasy

if like 20 of the teams don't want the trade to happen, then it doesn't happen


that way trades like

kwame brown for pau gasol don't happen
shaq for ben wallace doesn't happen

Side note:
I also think that sign & trade should be dropped altogether and instead provide a compensation system of handing out draft picks like in the mlb, the compensation of which will be determined the following season depending on the performance of the player that was signed

like if someone else picked up jeff green and he started averaging 18/5 on some other team that would provide us an additional pick ~25 in next year's draft

Honestly the lottery should only be available for the bottom 10 teams, and 5 lottery picks should be given out each year.

the remaining picks should be handed out on record with additional compensation picks thrown in between...basically the draft should be expanded

I also think that rosters should be expanded to 20, and we are required to have 2 players in the D-league. 15 active players 3 inactive, 2 in the D-league.


/adderall rant studying for finals

[Fafnir]

Terrible idea, almost every trade would be vetoed in the end.

[Greenbean]

Make this kind of like fantasy

if like 20 of the teams don't want the trade to happen, then it doesn't happen


that way trades like

kwame brown for pau gasol don't happen
shaq for ben wallace doesn't happen

I dont know about your fantasy league but that system doesnt work. It is a necessary evil in fantasy sports, but entirely unfair in real sports.

How can these guys make unbiased decisions?

[manl_lui]

horrible idea, cuz most of these approvals will be really bias. Especially the small market team most likely will veto no matter if the trade is fair or not

[Marcus13]

Nahh - then rival teams are just going to veto trades left and right then.  Or contendors may say no to deals if another contendor makes a good move