In the beginning of WWII, Hitler was essentially given Poland in the hopes that it would quench his thirst for power. Obviously, it didn't.
The same is true for this lockout. The owners wanted more money. They got it. Revenue sharing was 57-43 in favor of the players. Now its roughly 51-49 (correct me if I'm wrong).
However, none of the biggest issues were really addressed. Small market teams will continue to incur big losses for a few reasons, not all of which I am knowledgeable about :
-sign and trades are still allowed for two years, permitting franchises over the cap to bring in more players.
-the MLE still exists, which also favors high level franchises.
-contract length is decreased favoring player movement to big cities
(There are more reasons, which escape me.)
Also, unlike in other sports, the number of high level players is far fewer. Those players (IMO selfishly) demand to play only in large markets. More than half the league's teams don't meet these standards. So once you have teams like Miami hoarding 3, that puts other franchises at a disadvantage.
In another six years, when there is an opt out option, we will go through the same thing all over again. They should start discussing these things now, because it may take that long to devise an adequate solution.
I believe it starts with contraction of maybe 4 teams, but it should also involve restrictions on player movement and steeper salary cuts to the middle and lower class.