I wonder what the reasoning behind this is. Are some teams/execs/owners looking at the draft and saying, “Man look at all those quality guys the Spurs drafted with late first round or second round picks. If we had drafted Dajuan Blair, George Hill, Tiago Splitter, Beno Udrih, Leandro Barbosa, John Salmons, Luis Scola, Tony Parker, etc. we would be such a better team!” So if we change the system and give the bad teams better draft picks, they’ll get better faster?
The thing is, if you change around the picks, instead of the Spurs drafting George Hill at #26 or Tiago Splitter at #27, they probably just draft them in the mid 30’s. If the Spurs had a 1st round pick in 2009, they probably would have still drafted Dujuan Blair, but instead of being the 37th pick he would have been the 25th pick. Certain teams are good at the draft, certain teams stink at it. When you get that late in the draft, I think it’s more about the team that’s drafting than where the pick is. Also I think a lot of teams suck because they blew it in the draft several years in a row, don’t give them another chance to blow it. With 2 first round picks instead of the usual 1, those bad teams might be more willing to gamble. “We drafted a sure thing with Hasheem Thabeet with our first 1st round pick, but since we have two let’s roll the dice on this next one!"
I have doubts about how much this would really help the bad teams.