Author Topic: Need 3rd string PG bad: Banish Bradley  (Read 11304 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Need 3rd string PG bad: Banish Bradley
« Reply #45 on: March 03, 2011, 10:48:45 PM »

Offline Dunn

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 150
  • Tommy Points: 11
This was a reaction to Avery's play which is actually improving. Why have you left out that after Avery was sat down, the Suns still were coming back. I had already ask for Bradley's trade and was shocked he wasn't but he's trying to not become Gabe, gotta give him that. It gives me a whole new respect for Rondo, because at least I can't put a boat load of credit on Doc for his development when his other 1st rounder looks left to figure this game out on his own. Speaking of, Suns were still coming back hard when Rondo returned. Doc did what he usually does, he kept Baby on the floor while sitting the rest of the second unit. Ironically KG barked at the Celtics bench minus Baby, til he eventually had to sub in for Baby himself. So you see, it didn't begin or end with Avery.

Re: Need 3rd string PG bad: Banish Bradley
« Reply #46 on: March 03, 2011, 11:30:12 PM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
Avery is still not good enough to get minutes in the playoffs should Delonte or Rondo go down.  Sign Arroyo.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson