Nate not 100%?

[jarufu]

http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/celtics/post/_/id/4679257/ainge-no-need-for-sheed

In the article (I didn't know that Sheed has shown up in the locker room a few times ..) is the mention by Danny that Nate isn't 100% .. did I miss something?  Could it go some way to an explanation for the bad performance of late?

[MichaelRV]

Ainge is right, if we should be worried about something it should be about the issues on the front court. If Nate really is injured it might have contributed to his bad shooting, but in all seriousness he just made so many bad decisions and I just don't see this injury being an enough of an excuse.

[Bankshot]

I remember hearing something about his shoulder a couple of weeks ago.  Would explain his poor shooting lately.

[pearljammer10]

Probably got injured when his face met the hardwood after the knicks game.

[Eat Your Greenys]

Nate is Nate....haven't seen anything that makes me thing it's injuries

He's the same as when he was in NY

When things are rolling, he's one of the most exciting players in the NBA with his height and vertical ability.....but when things aren't rolling, he's a turnover machine that makes mistakes like he's a rookie

he is what he is

[Jon]

Nate's health won't be all that important as soon as Rondo's back.  We could get by with Marquis or even Bradley playing 10 mpg at the backup PG if need be.