0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
QuoteSo for an example if Jeff were to vote he might send this (if he decided to vote solely on "superstars ):. . . LakersFor the record, the Fake Kings have more superstars than the Fakers (Rose & Boozer vs. Roy).
So for an example if Jeff were to vote he might send this (if he decided to vote solely on "superstars ):. . . Lakers
Quote from: Roy H. on September 14, 2010, 09:25:15 PMQuoteSo for an example if Jeff were to vote he might send this (if he decided to vote solely on "superstars ):. . . LakersFor the record, the Fake Kings have more superstars than the Fakers (Rose & Boozer vs. Roy). For the record, none of those players should count as a superstar.
Quote from: KCattheStripe on September 14, 2010, 11:08:39 PMQuote from: Roy H. on September 14, 2010, 09:25:15 PMQuoteSo for an example if Jeff were to vote he might send this (if he decided to vote solely on "superstars ):. . . LakersFor the record, the Fake Kings have more superstars than the Fakers (Rose & Boozer vs. Roy). For the record, none of those players should count as a superstar.I guess it depends on the definition. If none of Rose, Roy, and Boozer count, neither does Amare.