0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Evantime34 on April 20, 2010, 02:26:15 PMQuote from: Roy Hobbs on April 20, 2010, 02:21:56 PMHolt obviously isn't the star he used to be, but he'll be fine as a second or third receiver.Agree completely. He caught 50 balls last year with a mediocre Qb throwing to him.If the Pats draft Bryant in the 1st or Tate in the 2nd, when Welker comes back I believe their WR corps will be one of the best in the league.They won't draft Dez Bryant. He'll be gone before #22, and the Pats VERY rarely trade up to pick someone - and Bryant's not the guy they'll trade up for. Golden Tate, maybe in the second. Not sure about him since he seems to project as a slot guy, and they've got Welker coming back and Welker II in Edelman. Maybe with the last 2nd rounder if he's still on the board, but I'm thinking they address their needs at TE, LB, and maybe RB before grabbing a wideout. Don't forget the other Tate (Brandon?) that we drafted last year, they seem to be reasonably high on him.EDIT: As to Torry Holt.... meh. Maybe he's got enough left to be a fourth wideout, but we'll have to see. He's spent most of his career indoors, too, let's see how he does in January (or ideally... February ).
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on April 20, 2010, 02:21:56 PMHolt obviously isn't the star he used to be, but he'll be fine as a second or third receiver.Agree completely. He caught 50 balls last year with a mediocre Qb throwing to him.If the Pats draft Bryant in the 1st or Tate in the 2nd, when Welker comes back I believe their WR corps will be one of the best in the league.
Holt obviously isn't the star he used to be, but he'll be fine as a second or third receiver.
Quote from: the_Bird on April 20, 2010, 03:15:32 PMQuote from: Evantime34 on April 20, 2010, 02:26:15 PMQuote from: Roy Hobbs on April 20, 2010, 02:21:56 PMHolt obviously isn't the star he used to be, but he'll be fine as a second or third receiver.Agree completely. He caught 50 balls last year with a mediocre Qb throwing to him.If the Pats draft Bryant in the 1st or Tate in the 2nd, when Welker comes back I believe their WR corps will be one of the best in the league.They won't draft Dez Bryant. He'll be gone before #22, and the Pats VERY rarely trade up to pick someone - and Bryant's not the guy they'll trade up for. Golden Tate, maybe in the second. Not sure about him since he seems to project as a slot guy, and they've got Welker coming back and Welker II in Edelman. Maybe with the last 2nd rounder if he's still on the board, but I'm thinking they address their needs at TE, LB, and maybe RB before grabbing a wideout. Don't forget the other Tate (Brandon?) that we drafted last year, they seem to be reasonably high on him.EDIT: As to Torry Holt.... meh. Maybe he's got enough left to be a fourth wideout, but we'll have to see. He's spent most of his career indoors, too, let's see how he does in January (or ideally... February ).A game played in February would be played indoors and in a warm location !
Let's hope he doesn't turn into Joey Galloway (he shouldn't).
prediction: 70 catches, 850 yards (if healthy all year).
Quote from: muddy02 on April 20, 2010, 04:23:00 PMprediction: 70 catches, 850 yards (if healthy all year).Not a chance, he won't get that many targets. Best-case, he'll be the third wideout at the start of the season and fourth once Welker's back.An optimist looks at Holt's numbers last year and adjusts upwards because he had a crappy QB throwing him the ball. A pessimist adjusts downward because there wasn't really anyone else to throw the ball to. Count me in the latter camp.
I love it. It means instead of being tempted to reach for a WR in the 1rst, they can wait till the 2nd round and get a Damian Williams, or even the the 4th or something and get a Taylor Price or someone