« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?  (Read 2429 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« on: August 01, 2009, 03:35:54 PM »

Offline SCBirdman

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 478
  • Tommy Points: 31
He is more versatile than BBD and can shoot the 3 ball. Don't know if they would do it, but he would give us a guy that can play 3 and 4 with the second unit.

Maybe we sign Ben Wallace or Joe Smith for the other post.
Logged
Re: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2009, 03:44:44 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan06

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 733
  • Tommy Points: 42
Yeah I think I would do this, but Denver has been clear they wants to keep Kleiza and I don't think they have that kind of interest in BBD, I think NJ is the main team left with interest in Baby.
Logged
Re: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2009, 04:18:19 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
If he can legitimately play PF as well as SF, Yes.
Logged
Re: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2009, 06:24:28 PM »

Offline kg is king

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 508
  • Tommy Points: 37
  • KG IS THE KING
I would still prefer Big Baby as he can provide the poundage to keep(or try to) Shaq and Dwight out of the paint. Kleiza cannot be used as an extra body in that way though...
Logged
"I'm from the bottom, I understand what it's like to have and to not have. My perception on giving is to put yourself in those people's shoes and go from there. So that's what I did. " - The One and Only KG
Re: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2009, 06:58:48 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Yes i would becuase he fills two roles.

Daniels, House, Walker, Kleiza, Sheed

Daniels, House Kleiza, Sheed, Perkins
Logged
Re: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2009, 07:00:36 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
Kleiza and Ben Wallace?  I'd call that an offseason.
Logged
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale
Re: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2009, 08:50:56 PM »

Offline billysan

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3875
  • Tommy Points: 178
Quote from: ManUp on August 01, 2009, 04:18:19 PM
If he can legitimately play PF as well as SF, Yes.
I think he can as much as Posey could but without the defense. A 7fter or heavyweight post guy is still going to be a problem just like it always was for Posey.

Logged
"First fix their hearts" -Eizo Shimabuku
Re: Would you S&T BBD for Linas Kleiza?
« Reply #7 on: August 01, 2009, 10:12:46 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
I prefer Baby because he can also backup C.

I like Kleiza a lot, but his game is too similar to Scals....he's a better version, but his talent is comparable to Baby. and Baby fits our needs better.

now if you could move Scals for a backup C, then I wouldn't have a problem swapping Baby for Kleiza.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »