Author Topic: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?  (Read 4514 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #15 on: April 28, 2009, 04:00:39 PM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2681
  • Tommy Points: 579
I think it depends what you could get for him. Let's say you could rangle something like Jefferson, Gomes, and Telfair from the Timberwolves, well than you'd have to think about it. I bet you could even get them to throw in a few draft choices. ::)

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2009, 04:07:11 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
I think it depends what you could get for him. Let's say you could rangle something like Jefferson, Gomes, and Telfair from the Timberwolves, well than you'd have to think about it. I bet you could even get them to throw in a few draft choices. ::)

No way I do that straight up.

Somehow we need to get Dallas involved, they have this amazingly gifted swing man that could definitely be Paul's replacement. Best thing of all is that there's coach is too fricking stupid to play him!

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2009, 04:13:11 PM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2681
  • Tommy Points: 579
I think it depends what you could get for him. Let's say you could rangle something like Jefferson, Gomes, and Telfair from the Timberwolves, well than you'd have to think about it. I bet you could even get them to throw in a few draft choices. ::)

No way I do that straight up.

Somehow we need to get Dallas involved, they have this amazingly gifted swing man that could definitely be Paul's replacement. Best thing of all is that there's coach is too fricking stupid to play him!

Sure, what the heck, since we're dreaming anyway. Might as well reach for the stars.

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2009, 04:19:55 PM »

Offline PierceMVP08

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 445
  • Tommy Points: 114
  • And the Truth shall set you free
I agree, we don't trade him.  If we win it without him, we're only  better with him.  One question though.  Why are people calling Garnett a savior as if he did everything on his own?  The other guys had a lot to do with it, especially those by the names of Pierce and Allen.  We are struggling without KG, yes, but we would be just as bad, if not worse without Paul or maybe Ray.  Calling him a savior is a bit much.

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #19 on: April 28, 2009, 04:22:15 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
I agree, we don't trade him.  If we win it without him, we're only  better with him.  One question though.  Why are people calling Garnett a savior as if he did everything on his own?  The other guys had a lot to do with it, especially those by the names of Pierce and Allen.  We are struggling without KG, yes, but we would be just as bad, if not worse without Paul or maybe Ray.  Calling him a savior is a bit much.

I don't really agree.  Our team only succeeds because of defense.  KG is the defensive savior. Without him we get lit up by teams like Chicago. 

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #20 on: April 28, 2009, 04:24:55 PM »

Offline PierceMVP08

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 445
  • Tommy Points: 114
  • And the Truth shall set you free
I agree, we don't trade him.  If we win it without him, we're only  better with him.  One question though.  Why are people calling Garnett a savior as if he did everything on his own?  The other guys had a lot to do with it, especially those by the names of Pierce and Allen.  We are struggling without KG, yes, but we would be just as bad, if not worse without Paul or maybe Ray.  Calling him a savior is a bit much.

I don't really agree.  Our team only succeeds because of defense.  KG is the defensive savior. Without him we get lit up by teams like Chicago. 

Where doe we come up with the scoring without Paul.  No one on this team can create his own shot and come up with big plays like Pierce does.  Yeah, Ray hits HUGE shots, but only because they have to ability to use Paul as a decoy.  If he's not there, Ray's not open.  KG is no decoy and he probably ends up taking most big shots, or somebody else, and I'm not very confident in that.  Don't underestimate Pierce's role

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #21 on: April 28, 2009, 05:13:52 PM »

Offline guachi

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 27
  • Tommy Points: 5
Some people freak so much when you ask a valid question as would we still keep him?,   am I suppose to only say how great our Boston players are, or can I talk real. Because if we win it's a real possibility that we get rid off him. Not that I agree with that but there is the possibility.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2009, 05:19:49 PM by guachi »

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #22 on: April 28, 2009, 05:37:13 PM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43
If you pull an all-nighter and still get an A, do you conclude that you don't need sleep?

yes
When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #23 on: April 28, 2009, 05:46:14 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
hell if we win it all without KG we should cut Ray and try to win without him too.

Re: If we win the championship without K.G, would we still keep him?
« Reply #24 on: April 28, 2009, 05:50:21 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
If you pull an all-nighter and still get an A, do you conclude that you don't need sleep?

yes

TP cause that was always one of the thoughts that would run through my sleep-depped mind about 15 seconds before I passed out for 11 hours. 

So I guess for my metaphor that means we might decide we don't need him, but he's bustin back in regardless.  Seems to fit KG well.