Schroder was awesome tonight. And as we get to the deadline I wonder if losing his offensive spark plug is a really bad idea…
I'd rather lose him for nothing this summer than give him away just to get under the luxury tax. I don't buy the rumors that we're desperate to move him for financial reasons. If a team comes with a good offer that helps us next year and beyond then ok, otherwise sayonara.
It really comes down to the opportunity cost of keeping him on, doesn't it. Brad has to weigh the value of him contributing to this existing team, which is currently costing us $5m or whatever it is and ending up walking away at the end of it, versus either the possibility that we may get a better deal for us financially, fit-wise or at the very least to "not lose him for nothing". The bean counters hate the concept of letting an asset walk away for nothing but sometimes we lose sight of the fact that while he is a rental, we are getting good value out of him right now.
I'm sure they're actively shopping him as a tradeable asset and I'm sure he knows it, but I don't think they will get rid of him purely as a cost cutting move - that would mean giving up on the season and the fact that our young kids are hardly getting playing time suggests they're not giving up on the season.