Author Topic: Another trade idea  (Read 1520 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Another trade idea
« on: March 03, 2021, 08:22:51 AM »

Offline arctic 3.0

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2554
  • Tommy Points: 406
Back when Danny and co were wheeling and dealing I used to play with the RealGM and ESPN trade machines.
Was fun but futile exercise.
Haven’t posted one in a long while but I think DA will make a move this deadline.
Here’s my attempt to influence the decision makers:
Because of trade exception rules this needs to be constructed as two trades.
1: Boston receives Aaron Gordon
    Orlando receives TE
2: Boston receives Evan Fournier
    Orlando receives Nesmith, G Williams, T Thompson and a second round pick.

This is just based on rumors that Orlando is looking to move on from these two young vets and reset around their young core.
The TE gives them flexibility to find the right player to fit with Vuc . They get an upside shooter, smart role player, and vet big man with short contract.
As for the c’s... Gordon can play all three front court positions. He would start at 4 next to the Jays, and back up Theis and RW. (Added bonus, more time for the timelord).
Fournier is a solid shooter who would be a huge asset off the bench. Our bench would be led by Smart and Fournier, and, with RW, giving us a really solid 8 man rotation.
Also, take the pressure off Romeo and P$ And let them grow into their roles.
Yes, we may loose Fornier in the off season, but we may also break through to the finals.

 Thought?


Re: Another trade idea
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2021, 08:44:21 AM »

Offline NKY fan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2349
  • Tommy Points: 106
These two names have been discussed at length in other threads. I think you need to add at least two FRPs in order for ORL to consider these moves.

Re: Another trade idea
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2021, 09:03:54 AM »

Offline arctic 3.0

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2554
  • Tommy Points: 406
These two names have been discussed at length in other threads. I think you need to add at least two FRPs in order for ORL to consider these moves.
Probably right about picks.
Including last years 14th pick is my attempt to limit sending out multiple future picks.