I asked this elsewhere but seems to fit here.
Which team says no in a Griffin for Wall swap?
If I am looking this up right, doesn't Wall have one more year and substantially more money per year? Wall has 41, 44 ,47 the next three years after this. Blake has two years left at 36 and 38? If this is correct than I think Wall's is way worse. I also don't really think there is any more evidence wall will be a better play post injury than blake. Wall relied heavily on athleticism to be a good player and doesn't seem like a great player. Blake at least has really improved his skill as a shooter and is a good passer for a big man (plus his size won't go anywhere)
What about Blake for Love? They have more similar contracts and blake is obviously out this year to help Cavs tank.