I could get behind a S&T with Kyrie that brought Dinwiddie to Boston. I mean, he's no Russell, but he is a lot cheaper and seems like a really solid player. Again, I realize a S&T with Irving is incredibly unlikely, just stating that I would be okay if the consolation prize was Dinwiddie.
A sign and trade involving Russel makes way more sense as they might end up renouncing him to make room for Harris/Kyrie or Butler/Kyrie.
Dinwiddie is now cost controlled and has dealt with a bench role for years, the kind of guy you need when you have two max FAs eating up most of your cap. I don't see that happening at all.
No. They want to keep russell. As they have stated multuple times.
Add to that russell can play off ball better than Dinwiddle.
Their best play is tobsign and trade for dinwiddie amd irving.
Sign another max free agent (butler)
Then either sign and trade or sign and keep russell at that time.
Keeping dinwiddie but sign and trading russell will NOT let them get another max free agent. They will not have the capspace to do so.
So it is this.
Kyrie and dinwiddie
Or
Kyrie, russell and butler