To test the level of disdain for Kyrie’s team impact, I wonder who here would take Kyrie for nothing? Or… let’s say the least talented package the Cs could offer. Or, if you could trade Justin Jackson straight up for Kyrie, would you do it?
Of course not.
Game theory wise, everyone wants to win a title. Kyrie is a train wreck and the odds are high that he will derail the team he is on over the course of any season. That is what he is doing to the Nets right now. That is what he did to them last year too.
The smaller, but still real possibility is you will catch him on one of his stretches of greatness in between his destructiveness cycles, and squeak out a title by lucky timing. His value is so degraded that you would get access to one of those stretches for a relatively insignificant cost.
This gamble only makes sense if you have a strong but problematic roster and you want to take a puncher's shot. You don't have a strong future, so you want to take a chance, accepting the inevitable longer term consequences.
It is insane for a well constructed contender to touch him, but there are some teams who only have a chance if they try a gamble like this. The thing is, that describes the Nets perfectly. They are doomed long term, and would benefit more by playing him than almost anyone else. They would have an outside shot this year. Once he leaves, its all over for them for a long time, regardless of any trade.