Author Topic: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28  (Read 107425 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #135 on: March 28, 2011, 08:09:33 PM »

Offline Adelaide Celt

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1371
  • Tommy Points: 206
1 shot each for Garnett and Allen that half...
NO AMOUNT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MANIPULATION, HORMONAL OR SURGICAL MUTILATION WILL EVER CHANGE A PERSON'S GENDER

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #136 on: March 28, 2011, 08:09:55 PM »

Offline YouCantHandleTheTruth!

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 676
  • Tommy Points: 31
And the second night of back to back curse continues.

Dang.

On the other hand, it doesn't really matter at this point.  We're not catching the Bulls.

So why are we watching this?
The Celtic in me.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #137 on: March 28, 2011, 08:10:08 PM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
Can't wait til Davis leaves as a FA this summer.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #138 on: March 28, 2011, 08:10:17 PM »

Offline get_banners

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1848
  • Tommy Points: 100
1 shot each for Garnett and Allen that half...
neither of them are comparable to the offensive machine that is big baby

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #139 on: March 28, 2011, 08:10:31 PM »

Offline letsgoblue86

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3666
  • Tommy Points: 283
I can't watch this garbage, no offense, no defense, and no calls.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #140 on: March 28, 2011, 08:10:55 PM »

Offline letsgoblue86

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3666
  • Tommy Points: 283
Can't wait til Davis leaves as a FA this summer.
Haha, TP

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #141 on: March 28, 2011, 08:11:13 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
C's usually lose when Rondo is the leading scorer. Keep that in mind.



Exactly he only takes over offensively when the rest of his team are ice cold which happens to be the cast tonight.

Ray, KG and everyone else have pretty much been non-factors.

We have a sub .500 record when Rondo is the leading scorer and a sub .500 record on the second night of a back to back.

Not good.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #142 on: March 28, 2011, 08:11:26 PM »

Offline Green Hell

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 419
  • Tommy Points: 58
And the second night of back to back curse continues.

Dang.

On the other hand, it doesn't really matter at this point.  We're not catching the Bulls.

We aren't catching the Lakers either so what does that say about our banner aspirations?
Never stop believing baby~

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #143 on: March 28, 2011, 08:11:55 PM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
Geez, what's up with all the optimism?

There are 48 minutes in a game and we're only down 8, chill out guys, we've got this one.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #144 on: March 28, 2011, 08:12:12 PM »

Offline Megatron

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1586
  • Tommy Points: 136
1 shot each for Garnett and Allen that half...

I dont understand these types of things I really dont.

KG and Allen arent demanding the ball or trying to be a part of the offense, thats what happens when your coasting.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #145 on: March 28, 2011, 08:12:35 PM »

Offline Errn

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 114
  • Tommy Points: 9
Jeff Green is awful on defense, as much as I try warmig up to the trade I hate it more and more everyday.

He simply doesn't use his hands to get in the face of his opponent. There was an inside pass that was made earlier that could have been prevented by simply PRESSURING the man in the post.

This makes it that much easier for shooters to shoot up over him. He doesn't put his body up against them. And he doesn't use his arms or hands nearly enough.

I thought this guy was supposed to be lightning quick? I guess that's only when he decides to go up for a dunk.

He's like a weak version of Derek Rose.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #146 on: March 28, 2011, 08:12:35 PM »

Online CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11748
  • Tommy Points: 893
  • GOT IT!!!
Looks like Doc is sticking with the 8 man rotation tonight.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #147 on: March 28, 2011, 08:12:44 PM »

Offline YouCantHandleTheTruth!

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 676
  • Tommy Points: 31
And the second night of back to back curse continues.

Dang.

On the other hand, it doesn't really matter at this point.  We're not catching the Bulls.

We aren't catching the Lakers either so what does that say about our banner aspirations?

Playing this bad, these are banned aspirations.
The Celtic in me.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #148 on: March 28, 2011, 08:12:56 PM »

Offline PseudoElite

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 298
  • Tommy Points: 42
Indiana scored 30 pts in the 2nd Q, and 27 in the 1st.

REALLY?

The offensive droughts are nothing new for the Celtics but letting Indiana score that much is ridiculous.
Celtics' turn on switch for the playoffs: the last bastion of hope for battered Celtic fans.

Re: Celtics (51-21) at Pacers (32-42) 3/28
« Reply #149 on: March 28, 2011, 08:13:11 PM »

Offline GrandTheftRondo

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1952
  • Tommy Points: 167
Well...not much has changed. This team is still bad but on the bright side it looks like Rondo has come out of his slump for at least this game.