0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Flop by TJ
Quote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:35:18 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:33:35 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:31:45 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:27:19 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:26:20 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:23:57 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:22:14 PMTatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.See Pierce, Paul. Top 50 all time player. 26,000 career points.Hyperbole much?love Pierce. He was never a superstar. Rookie Tatum has a higher ceiling than rookie piece had.Yeah. Lets not go there. Paul Pierce was a legit superstar. If he was playing in this 3 point shooting era, he'd have averaged 30, easy. Nope. Love Pierce. Wasn’t a superstar. I don’t label every allstar a superstar. Pierce was something like the 12th-20th best player in the league during his prime. Never even 1st team all-nba. Didn’t have real success until KG (a superstar) lead us to a title. Not knocking Pierce. Tatum might not have that level of success, but he’s the best prospect we’ve had since Larry Bird. Tatum has all the makings of a true all-nba 1st team level superstar if progresses as expected. I’ve been comparing him to rookie Kevin Durant all season.Were not around in 1996 and 97 when he was tearing up the NCAA and was projected to go 2 in that draft. He was a legit superstar prospect. You should go hunt some scouting reports. That was also an era where they didn't shoot 8 threes a game.pierce was an all-star prospect that peaked as an Allstar. Tatum is a superstar prospect. There’s a difference. I watched every game of paul’s career. Tatum is a better prospect. Doesn’t guarantee he will live up to his potential.Peaked as an all star??? He's one of the top 50 players in history, surefire first ballot hall of famer, top 20 all time in points scored, and second leading scorer in Boston Celtics history. You might wanna look up there term "peak".
Quote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:33:35 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:31:45 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:27:19 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:26:20 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:23:57 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:22:14 PMTatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.See Pierce, Paul. Top 50 all time player. 26,000 career points.Hyperbole much?love Pierce. He was never a superstar. Rookie Tatum has a higher ceiling than rookie piece had.Yeah. Lets not go there. Paul Pierce was a legit superstar. If he was playing in this 3 point shooting era, he'd have averaged 30, easy. Nope. Love Pierce. Wasn’t a superstar. I don’t label every allstar a superstar. Pierce was something like the 12th-20th best player in the league during his prime. Never even 1st team all-nba. Didn’t have real success until KG (a superstar) lead us to a title. Not knocking Pierce. Tatum might not have that level of success, but he’s the best prospect we’ve had since Larry Bird. Tatum has all the makings of a true all-nba 1st team level superstar if progresses as expected. I’ve been comparing him to rookie Kevin Durant all season.Were not around in 1996 and 97 when he was tearing up the NCAA and was projected to go 2 in that draft. He was a legit superstar prospect. You should go hunt some scouting reports. That was also an era where they didn't shoot 8 threes a game.pierce was an all-star prospect that peaked as an Allstar. Tatum is a superstar prospect. There’s a difference. I watched every game of paul’s career. Tatum is a better prospect. Doesn’t guarantee he will live up to his potential.
Quote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:31:45 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:27:19 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:26:20 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:23:57 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:22:14 PMTatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.See Pierce, Paul. Top 50 all time player. 26,000 career points.Hyperbole much?love Pierce. He was never a superstar. Rookie Tatum has a higher ceiling than rookie piece had.Yeah. Lets not go there. Paul Pierce was a legit superstar. If he was playing in this 3 point shooting era, he'd have averaged 30, easy. Nope. Love Pierce. Wasn’t a superstar. I don’t label every allstar a superstar. Pierce was something like the 12th-20th best player in the league during his prime. Never even 1st team all-nba. Didn’t have real success until KG (a superstar) lead us to a title. Not knocking Pierce. Tatum might not have that level of success, but he’s the best prospect we’ve had since Larry Bird. Tatum has all the makings of a true all-nba 1st team level superstar if progresses as expected. I’ve been comparing him to rookie Kevin Durant all season.Were not around in 1996 and 97 when he was tearing up the NCAA and was projected to go 2 in that draft. He was a legit superstar prospect. You should go hunt some scouting reports. That was also an era where they didn't shoot 8 threes a game.
Quote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:27:19 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:26:20 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:23:57 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:22:14 PMTatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.See Pierce, Paul. Top 50 all time player. 26,000 career points.Hyperbole much?love Pierce. He was never a superstar. Rookie Tatum has a higher ceiling than rookie piece had.Yeah. Lets not go there. Paul Pierce was a legit superstar. If he was playing in this 3 point shooting era, he'd have averaged 30, easy. Nope. Love Pierce. Wasn’t a superstar. I don’t label every allstar a superstar. Pierce was something like the 12th-20th best player in the league during his prime. Never even 1st team all-nba. Didn’t have real success until KG (a superstar) lead us to a title. Not knocking Pierce. Tatum might not have that level of success, but he’s the best prospect we’ve had since Larry Bird. Tatum has all the makings of a true all-nba 1st team level superstar if progresses as expected. I’ve been comparing him to rookie Kevin Durant all season.
Quote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:26:20 PMQuote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:23:57 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:22:14 PMTatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.See Pierce, Paul. Top 50 all time player. 26,000 career points.Hyperbole much?love Pierce. He was never a superstar. Rookie Tatum has a higher ceiling than rookie piece had.Yeah. Lets not go there. Paul Pierce was a legit superstar. If he was playing in this 3 point shooting era, he'd have averaged 30, easy.
Quote from: bknova on May 05, 2018, 05:23:57 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:22:14 PMTatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.See Pierce, Paul. Top 50 all time player. 26,000 career points.Hyperbole much?love Pierce. He was never a superstar. Rookie Tatum has a higher ceiling than rookie piece had.
Quote from: LarBrd33 on May 05, 2018, 05:22:14 PMTatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.See Pierce, Paul. Top 50 all time player. 26,000 career points.Hyperbole much?
Tatum is my favorite rookie ever. First legit superstar prospect we’ve had since Bird and I wasn’t alive during Larry’s rookie year.