The two I would not pick are steph and luka, oh and kyrie. Those are three of the WORST defenders at the guard position in the league, at least among those that get significant minutes or are viewed as stars. luka for MVP is a joke. He isn't in my top 10. 1 dimensional players should not be viewed equally to players who play a complete game. Embiid, Giannis, Jokic, tatum are far superior to players like Luka. Tatum should be rewarded for sacrificing personal stats for the team. He should be top 3 in MVP, even if he doesn't win.
Wow, I have not seen too many who agree with me on this. I am totally with you on Luka, sensational individual player but it has never translated to team success, which is supposed to be part of the calculation for MVP. Luka does not make players better, he makes them worse. Look at Brunson. Look at Porzingis. He has had good players to work with. As to the guard/Curry question, I take Curry over Luka if I am trying to assemble a team to win a title.
I am also with you on the MVP. I definitely have Tatum ahead of Doncic. I have Giannis ahead of Doncic too. Shai is a tougher call. His team is winning this season but prior to that, all his teams were lottery team. I would take Tatum over SGA if I was building a team to win a title, but I can understand the MVP love he is getting.
A hypothetical, what would be a better team core for a title:
Jokic + Doncic + SGA (the top 3 for MVP)
or
Curry + Tatum + Giannis
I would take the latter.